[clang-format] fix regression recognizing casts in Obj-C calls

Summary:
r373922 added checks for a few tokens that, following an `)` make it
unlikely that the `)` is the closing paren of a cast expression. The
specific check for `tok::l_square` there introduced a regression for
casts of Obj-C calls, like:
```
(cast)[func arg]
```
From the tests added in r373922, I believe the `tok::l_square` case is added to
capture the case where a non-cast `)` is directly followed by an
attribute specifier, like:
```
int f(int x) [[noreturn]];
```

I've specialized the code to look for such attribute specifier instead
of `tok::l_square` in general. Also, I added a regression test and moved
the test cases added in r373922 to an already existing place documenting
other instances of historically misidentified casts.

Reviewers: MyDeveloperDay

Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69164

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@375247 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp b/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp
index 9823a5af9c..7aa1f378f0 100644
--- a/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp
+++ b/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp
@@ -1607,8 +1607,9 @@ private:
     // Functions which end with decorations like volatile, noexcept are unlikely
     // to be casts.
     if (Tok.Next->isOneOf(tok::kw_noexcept, tok::kw_volatile, tok::kw_const,
-                          tok::kw_throw, tok::l_square, tok::arrow,
-                          Keywords.kw_override, Keywords.kw_final))
+                          tok::kw_throw, tok::arrow, Keywords.kw_override,
+                          Keywords.kw_final) ||
+        isCpp11AttributeSpecifier(*Tok.Next))
       return false;
 
     // As Java has no function types, a "(" after the ")" likely means that this