|author||Cong Wang <firstname.lastname@example.org>||2018-06-05 09:48:13 -0700|
|committer||David S. Miller <email@example.com>||2018-06-05 14:19:45 -0400|
netdev-FAQ: clarify DaveM's position for stable backports
Per discussion with David at netconf 2018, let's clarify DaveM's position of handling stable backports in netdev-FAQ. This is important for people relying on upstream -stable releases. Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <firstname.lastname@example.org> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <email@example.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <firstname.lastname@example.org>
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.txt b/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.txt
index 2a3278d5cf35..fa951b820b25 100644
@@ -179,6 +179,15 @@ A: No. See above answer. In short, if you think it really belongs in
dash marker line as described in Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst to
temporarily embed that information into the patch that you send.
+Q: Are all networking bug fixes backported to all stable releases?
+A: Due to capacity, Dave could only take care of the backports for the last
+ 2 stable releases. For earlier stable releases, each stable branch maintainer
+ is supposed to take care of them. If you find any patch is missing from an
+ earlier stable branch, please notify email@example.com with either a
+ commit ID or a formal patch backported, and CC Dave and other relevant
+ networking developers.
Q: Someone said that the comment style and coding convention is different
for the networking content. Is this true?