diff options
| author | Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> | 2006-03-31 02:32:13 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@g5.osdl.org> | 2006-03-31 12:19:01 -0800 |
| commit | e358c1a2c45f7ec32d77cc09a2bb42d6823a4193 (patch) | |
| tree | ae35f543a333abe1a76852870c5a2579c02bc38a /include/asm-generic/mutex-xchg.h | |
| parent | a58e00e7da5f93c096527f5e20ceb2cf6d130cf0 (diff) | |
[PATCH] mutex: some cleanups
Turn some macros into inline functions and add proper type checking as
well as being more readable. Also a minor comment adjustment.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/asm-generic/mutex-xchg.h')
| -rw-r--r-- | include/asm-generic/mutex-xchg.h | 33 |
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 16 deletions
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/mutex-xchg.h b/include/asm-generic/mutex-xchg.h index 1d24f47e6c48..32a2100c1aeb 100644 --- a/include/asm-generic/mutex-xchg.h +++ b/include/asm-generic/mutex-xchg.h @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ * * Generic implementation of the mutex fastpath, based on xchg(). * - * NOTE: An xchg based implementation is less optimal than an atomic + * NOTE: An xchg based implementation might be less optimal than an atomic * decrement/increment based implementation. If your architecture * has a reasonable atomic dec/inc then you should probably use * asm-generic/mutex-dec.h instead, or you could open-code an @@ -22,14 +22,14 @@ * wasn't 1 originally. This function MUST leave the value lower than 1 * even when the "1" assertion wasn't true. */ -#define __mutex_fastpath_lock(count, fail_fn) \ -do { \ - if (unlikely(atomic_xchg(count, 0) != 1)) \ - fail_fn(count); \ - else \ - smp_mb(); \ -} while (0) - +static inline void +__mutex_fastpath_lock(atomic_t *count, fastcall void (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *)) +{ + if (unlikely(atomic_xchg(count, 0) != 1)) + fail_fn(count); + else + smp_mb(); +} /** * __mutex_fastpath_lock_retval - try to take the lock by moving the count @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ do { \ * or anything the slow path function returns */ static inline int -__mutex_fastpath_lock_retval(atomic_t *count, int (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *)) +__mutex_fastpath_lock_retval(atomic_t *count, fastcall int (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *)) { if (unlikely(atomic_xchg(count, 0) != 1)) return fail_fn(count); @@ -64,12 +64,13 @@ __mutex_fastpath_lock_retval(atomic_t *count, int (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *)) * __mutex_slowpath_needs_to_unlock() macro needs to return 1, it needs * to return 0 otherwise. */ -#define __mutex_fastpath_unlock(count, fail_fn) \ -do { \ - smp_mb(); \ - if (unlikely(atomic_xchg(count, 1) != 0)) \ - fail_fn(count); \ -} while (0) +static inline void +__mutex_fastpath_unlock(atomic_t *count, fastcall void (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *)) +{ + smp_mb(); + if (unlikely(atomic_xchg(count, 1) != 0)) + fail_fn(count); +} #define __mutex_slowpath_needs_to_unlock() 0 |