aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSalman Qazi <sqazi@google.com>2009-02-23 18:03:04 -0800
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>2009-02-24 17:16:36 +0100
commit30d697fa3a25fed809a873b17531a00282dc1234 (patch)
treebc17d39779914b4dcf7a7d7b9e08d8b020cbf0b6 /arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h
parentcb425afd2183e90a481bb211ff49361a117a3ecc (diff)
x86: fix performance regression in write() syscall
While the introduction of __copy_from_user_nocache (see commit: 0812a579c92fefa57506821fa08e90f47cb6dbdd) may have been an improvement for sufficiently large writes, there is evidence to show that it is deterimental for small writes. Unixbench's fstime test gives the following results for 256 byte writes with MAX_BLOCK of 2000: 2.6.29-rc6 ( 5 samples, each in KB/sec ): 283750, 295200, 294500, 293000, 293300 2.6.29-rc6 + this patch (5 samples, each in KB/sec): 313050, 3106750, 293350, 306300, 307900 2.6.18 395700, 342000, 399100, 366050, 359850 See w_test() in src/fstime.c in unixbench version 4.1.0. Basically, the above test consists of counting how much we can write in this manner: alarm(10); while (!sigalarm) { for (f_blocks = 0; f_blocks < 2000; ++f_blocks) { write(f, buf, 256); } lseek(f, 0L, 0); } Note, there are other components to the write syscall regression that are not addressed here. Signed-off-by: Salman Qazi <sqazi@google.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h')
-rw-r--r--arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h16
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h
index 84210c479fc..987a2c10fe2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h
@@ -192,14 +192,26 @@ static inline int __copy_from_user_nocache(void *dst, const void __user *src,
unsigned size)
{
might_sleep();
- return __copy_user_nocache(dst, src, size, 1);
+ /*
+ * In practice this limit means that large file write()s
+ * which get chunked to 4K copies get handled via
+ * non-temporal stores here. Smaller writes get handled
+ * via regular __copy_from_user():
+ */
+ if (likely(size >= PAGE_SIZE))
+ return __copy_user_nocache(dst, src, size, 1);
+ else
+ return __copy_from_user(dst, src, size);
}
static inline int __copy_from_user_inatomic_nocache(void *dst,
const void __user *src,
unsigned size)
{
- return __copy_user_nocache(dst, src, size, 0);
+ if (likely(size >= PAGE_SIZE))
+ return __copy_user_nocache(dst, src, size, 0);
+ else
+ return __copy_from_user_inatomic(dst, src, size);
}
unsigned long