summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNeil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>2007-04-26 13:47:36 -0400
committerJeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>2007-04-27 20:16:41 -0400
commitdc5a144991ba803bc8afded105c9db1dea0e57ab (patch)
tree81366a449cc3236446f7d84523e35eb260cfb524
parent1764f15016fea54db723a96234a82646dac9a036 (diff)
sis900: Allocate rx replacement buffer before rx operation
Just found a hole in my last patch. It was reported to me that shortly after we integrated this patch. The report was of an oops that took place inside of netif_rx when using the sis900 driver. Looking at my origional patch I noted that there was a spot between the new skb_alloc and the refill_rx_ring label where skb got reassigned to the pointer currently held in the rx_ring for the purposes of receiveing the frame. The result of this is however that the buffer that gets passed to netif_rx (if it is called), then gets placed right back into the rx_ring. So if you receive frames fast enough the skb being processed by the network stack can get corrupted. The reporter is testing out the fix I've written for this below (I'm not near my hardware at the moment to test myself), but I wanted to post it for review ASAP. I'll post test results when I hear them, but I think this is a pretty straightforward fix. It just uses a separate pointer to do the rx operation, so that we don't improperly reassign the pointer that we use to refill the rx ring. Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
-rw-r--r--drivers/net/sis900.c9
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/sis900.c b/drivers/net/sis900.c
index dea0126723d..2cb2e156c75 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sis900.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sis900.c
@@ -1753,6 +1753,7 @@ static int sis900_rx(struct net_device *net_dev)
sis_priv->rx_ring[entry].cmdsts = RX_BUF_SIZE;
} else {
struct sk_buff * skb;
+ struct sk_buff * rx_skb;
pci_unmap_single(sis_priv->pci_dev,
sis_priv->rx_ring[entry].bufptr, RX_BUF_SIZE,
@@ -1786,10 +1787,10 @@ static int sis900_rx(struct net_device *net_dev)
}
/* give the socket buffer to upper layers */
- skb = sis_priv->rx_skbuff[entry];
- skb_put(skb, rx_size);
- skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, net_dev);
- netif_rx(skb);
+ rx_skb = sis_priv->rx_skbuff[entry];
+ skb_put(rx_skb, rx_size);
+ rx_skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(rx_skb, net_dev);
+ netif_rx(rx_skb);
/* some network statistics */
if ((rx_status & BCAST) == MCAST)