aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>2008-05-18 20:49:41 +0200
committerJean Delvare <khali@hyperion.delvare>2008-05-18 20:49:41 +0200
commit70455e790391dac85d9b483a9e286a40df1ecc7f (patch)
treef5ea301f7aaec341e718fb187d81d3afa65ec6bd
parent875b0a473c3ddd80bc4ae88a65cd20027428e160 (diff)
i2c/max6875: Really prevent 24RF08 corruption
i2c-core takes care of the possible corruption of 24RF08 chips for quite some times, so device devices no longer need to do it. And they really should not, as applying the prevention twice voids it. I thought that I had fixed all drivers long ago but apparently I had missed that one. Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> Cc: Ben Gardner <bgardner@wabtec.com>
-rw-r--r--drivers/i2c/chips/max6875.c3
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/chips/max6875.c b/drivers/i2c/chips/max6875.c
index fb7ea5637ec..cf507b3f60f 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/chips/max6875.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/chips/max6875.c
@@ -207,9 +207,6 @@ static int max6875_detect(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, int address, int kind)
fake_client->flags = 0;
strlcpy(fake_client->name, "max6875 subclient", I2C_NAME_SIZE);
- /* Prevent 24RF08 corruption (in case of user error) */
- i2c_smbus_write_quick(real_client, 0);
-
if ((err = i2c_attach_client(real_client)) != 0)
goto exit_kfree2;