cpufreq: move freq change notifications to cpufreq core
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
There are few special cases though, like exynos5440, which doesn't do everything
on the call to ->target_index() routine and call some kind of bottom halves for
doing this work, work/tasklet/etc..
They may continue doing notification from their own code as flag:
CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION is already set for them.
All drivers are also modified in this patch to avoid breaking 'git bisect', as
double notification would happen otherwise.
Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Tested-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c
index 4dbe7ef..d4585ce 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c
@@ -37,20 +37,19 @@
static int cpu0_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
{
- struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
unsigned long volt = 0, volt_old = 0, tol = 0;
+ unsigned int old_freq, new_freq;
long freq_Hz, freq_exact;
int ret;
freq_Hz = clk_round_rate(cpu_clk, freq_table[index].frequency * 1000);
if (freq_Hz < 0)
freq_Hz = freq_table[index].frequency * 1000;
- freq_exact = freq_Hz;
- freqs.new = freq_Hz / 1000;
- freqs.old = clk_get_rate(cpu_clk) / 1000;
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
+ freq_exact = freq_Hz;
+ new_freq = freq_Hz / 1000;
+ old_freq = clk_get_rate(cpu_clk) / 1000;
if (!IS_ERR(cpu_reg)) {
rcu_read_lock();
@@ -58,9 +57,7 @@
if (IS_ERR(opp)) {
rcu_read_unlock();
pr_err("failed to find OPP for %ld\n", freq_Hz);
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
- ret = PTR_ERR(opp);
- goto post_notify;
+ return PTR_ERR(opp);
}
volt = dev_pm_opp_get_voltage(opp);
rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -69,16 +66,15 @@
}
pr_debug("%u MHz, %ld mV --> %u MHz, %ld mV\n",
- freqs.old / 1000, volt_old ? volt_old / 1000 : -1,
- freqs.new / 1000, volt ? volt / 1000 : -1);
+ old_freq / 1000, volt_old ? volt_old / 1000 : -1,
+ new_freq / 1000, volt ? volt / 1000 : -1);
/* scaling up? scale voltage before frequency */
- if (!IS_ERR(cpu_reg) && freqs.new > freqs.old) {
+ if (!IS_ERR(cpu_reg) && new_freq > old_freq) {
ret = regulator_set_voltage_tol(cpu_reg, volt, tol);
if (ret) {
pr_err("failed to scale voltage up: %d\n", ret);
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
- goto post_notify;
+ return ret;
}
}
@@ -87,23 +83,18 @@
pr_err("failed to set clock rate: %d\n", ret);
if (!IS_ERR(cpu_reg))
regulator_set_voltage_tol(cpu_reg, volt_old, tol);
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
- goto post_notify;
+ return ret;
}
/* scaling down? scale voltage after frequency */
- if (!IS_ERR(cpu_reg) && freqs.new < freqs.old) {
+ if (!IS_ERR(cpu_reg) && new_freq < old_freq) {
ret = regulator_set_voltage_tol(cpu_reg, volt, tol);
if (ret) {
pr_err("failed to scale voltage down: %d\n", ret);
- clk_set_rate(cpu_clk, freqs.old * 1000);
- freqs.new = freqs.old;
+ clk_set_rate(cpu_clk, old_freq * 1000);
}
}
-post_notify:
- cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
return ret;
}