ACPICA: Standardize all switch() blocks
After many years, different formatting for switch() has crept in.
This change makes every switch block identical. Chao Guan.
ACPICA bugzilla 997.
References: https://bugs.acpica.org/show_bug.cgi?id=997
Signed-off-by: Chao Guan <chao.guan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/rsmisc.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/rsmisc.c
index d5bf05a..80d1299 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/rsmisc.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/rsmisc.c
@@ -194,7 +194,6 @@
break;
case ACPI_RSC_COUNT_GPIO_RES:
-
/*
* Vendor data is optional (length/offset may both be zero)
* Examine vendor data length field first
@@ -410,12 +409,14 @@
*/
switch (info->resource_offset) {
case ACPI_RSC_COMPARE_AML_LENGTH:
+
if (aml_resource_length != info->value) {
goto exit;
}
break;
case ACPI_RSC_COMPARE_VALUE:
+
if (ACPI_GET8(source) != info->value) {
goto exit;
}