ACPICA: Standardize all switch() blocks
After many years, different formatting for switch() has crept in.
This change makes every switch block identical. Chao Guan.
ACPICA bugzilla 997.
References: https://bugs.acpica.org/show_bug.cgi?id=997
Signed-off-by: Chao Guan <chao.guan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/exprep.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/exprep.c
index 6b728ae..5a58861 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/exprep.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/exprep.c
@@ -253,26 +253,31 @@
case AML_FIELD_ACCESS_BYTE:
case AML_FIELD_ACCESS_BUFFER: /* ACPI 2.0 (SMBus Buffer) */
+
byte_alignment = 1;
bit_length = 8;
break;
case AML_FIELD_ACCESS_WORD:
+
byte_alignment = 2;
bit_length = 16;
break;
case AML_FIELD_ACCESS_DWORD:
+
byte_alignment = 4;
bit_length = 32;
break;
case AML_FIELD_ACCESS_QWORD: /* ACPI 2.0 */
+
byte_alignment = 8;
bit_length = 64;
break;
default:
+
/* Invalid field access type */
ACPI_ERROR((AE_INFO, "Unknown field access type 0x%X", access));
@@ -598,7 +603,9 @@
break;
default:
+
/* No other types should get here */
+
break;
}