perf hists: Add support for showing relative percentage

When filtering by thread, dso or symbol on TUI it also update total
period so that the output shows different result than no filter - the
percentage changed to relative to filtered entries only.  Sometimes
this is not desired since users might expect same results with filter.

So new filtered_* fields to hists->stats to count them separately.
They'll be controlled/used by user later.

Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1397145720-8063-2-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/hist.c b/tools/perf/util/hist.c
index f38590d..1ed3e2b 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/hist.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/hist.c
@@ -674,8 +674,8 @@
 	next = rb_first(root);
 	hists->entries = RB_ROOT;
 
-	hists->nr_entries = 0;
-	hists->stats.total_period = 0;
+	hists->nr_entries = hists->nr_non_filtered_entries = 0;
+	hists->stats.total_period = hists->stats.total_non_filtered_period = 0;
 	hists__reset_col_len(hists);
 
 	while (next) {
@@ -695,11 +695,16 @@
 		return;
 
 	++hists->nr_entries;
-	if (h->ms.unfolded)
+	++hists->nr_non_filtered_entries;
+	if (h->ms.unfolded) {
 		hists->nr_entries += h->nr_rows;
+		hists->nr_non_filtered_entries += h->nr_rows;
+	}
 	h->row_offset = 0;
 	hists->stats.total_period += h->stat.period;
+	hists->stats.total_non_filtered_period += h->stat.period;
 	hists->stats.nr_events[PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE] += h->stat.nr_events;
+	hists->stats.nr_non_filtered_samples += h->stat.nr_events;
 
 	hists__calc_col_len(hists, h);
 }
@@ -722,7 +727,9 @@
 	struct rb_node *nd;
 
 	hists->nr_entries = hists->stats.total_period = 0;
+	hists->nr_non_filtered_entries = hists->stats.total_non_filtered_period = 0;
 	hists->stats.nr_events[PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE] = 0;
+	hists->stats.nr_non_filtered_samples = 0;
 	hists__reset_col_len(hists);
 
 	for (nd = rb_first(&hists->entries); nd; nd = rb_next(nd)) {
@@ -755,7 +762,9 @@
 	struct rb_node *nd;
 
 	hists->nr_entries = hists->stats.total_period = 0;
+	hists->nr_non_filtered_entries = hists->stats.total_non_filtered_period = 0;
 	hists->stats.nr_events[PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE] = 0;
+	hists->stats.nr_non_filtered_samples = 0;
 	hists__reset_col_len(hists);
 
 	for (nd = rb_first(&hists->entries); nd; nd = rb_next(nd)) {
@@ -786,7 +795,9 @@
 	struct rb_node *nd;
 
 	hists->nr_entries = hists->stats.total_period = 0;
+	hists->nr_non_filtered_entries = hists->stats.total_non_filtered_period = 0;
 	hists->stats.nr_events[PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE] = 0;
+	hists->stats.nr_non_filtered_samples = 0;
 	hists__reset_col_len(hists);
 
 	for (nd = rb_first(&hists->entries); nd; nd = rb_next(nd)) {