From 024c6e2ea575d6ca2e3e1cfb8fcff7f218bb5daf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Crosthwaite Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 17:20:08 +0000 Subject: dma/pl330: Fix misleading type This type really should just be a regular int as no usages rely on it's 32 bitness (it's only meaningful as a bit position and not a bit mask). This also fixes a printf which uses the variable with a regular %d. Signed-off-by: Peter Crosthwaite Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell Message-id: 2a99d31f377aee371476d9da8fd0d1b7efa30f63.1393372019.git.peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell --- hw/dma/pl330.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/hw/dma/pl330.c b/hw/dma/pl330.c index 68adf39e33..d36f0bc20f 100644 --- a/hw/dma/pl330.c +++ b/hw/dma/pl330.c @@ -1310,7 +1310,7 @@ static void pl330_iomem_write(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, uint64_t value, unsigned size) { PL330State *s = (PL330State *) opaque; - uint32_t i; + int i; DB_PRINT("addr: %08x data: %08x\n", (unsigned)offset, (unsigned)value); -- cgit v1.2.3