| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-id: 1450752561-9300-9-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
|
|
all these tests do anything of the following and thus fail with any
protocol other than file:
- the tests use rm, cp or mv shell commands which only work on file
- the tests use qcow2.py
- the images construct new filenames (e.g. backing file names) and
the logic is broken for anything else than file
Signed-off-by: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
A lot of image filename and paths are used unquoted. Quote these to
make sure that directories / filenames with spaces are not problematic.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
Test 038 uses asynchronous I/O, resulting (potentially) in a different
output for every run (regarding the order of the I/O accesses). This can
be fixed by simply sorting the I/O access messages, since their order is
irrelevant anyway (for this asynchonous I/O).
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
|
This one is a bit more interesting. The COW operation isn't performed
completely synchronously, and therefore dependencies must be handled
correctly when multiple requests write to the same unallocated cluster.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
