aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/target-ppc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDavid Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>2013-04-07 19:08:18 +0000
committerAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>2013-04-26 23:02:41 +0200
commitf36951c19f15f3c053a31234bd2c297d86c1a052 (patch)
treeab24b0a206802fd72670b5c5bf3df63899cf4d7d /target-ppc
parentc8ff5daa09516272117eb23cd00da5d188ba73eb (diff)
pseries: Fix incorrect calculation of RMA size in certain configurations
For the pseries machine, we need to advertise to the guest the size of its RMA - that is the amount of memory it can access with the MMU off. For HV KVM, this is constrained by the hardware limitations on the virtual RMA of one hash PTE per PTE group in the hash page table. We already had code to calculate this, but it was assuming the VRMA page size was the same as the (host) backing page size for guest RAM. In the case of a host kernel configured for 64k base page size, but running on hardware (or firmware) which only allows 4k pages, the hose will do all its allocations with a 64k page size, but still use 4k hardware pages for actual mappings. Usually that's transparent to things running under the host, but in the case of the maximum VRMA size it's not. This patch refines the RMA size calculation to instead use the largest available hardware page size (as reported by the SMMU_INFO call) which is less than or equal to the backing page size. This now gives the correct RMA size in all cases I've tested. Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'target-ppc')
-rw-r--r--target-ppc/kvm.c26
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/target-ppc/kvm.c b/target-ppc/kvm.c
index 759983dbae..a1fa8d3ddf 100644
--- a/target-ppc/kvm.c
+++ b/target-ppc/kvm.c
@@ -1446,11 +1446,35 @@ off_t kvmppc_alloc_rma(const char *name, MemoryRegion *sysmem)
uint64_t kvmppc_rma_size(uint64_t current_size, unsigned int hash_shift)
{
+ struct kvm_ppc_smmu_info info;
+ long rampagesize, best_page_shift;
+ int i;
+
if (cap_ppc_rma >= 2) {
return current_size;
}
+
+ /* Find the largest hardware supported page size that's less than
+ * or equal to the (logical) backing page size of guest RAM */
+ kvm_get_smmu_info(ppc_env_get_cpu(first_cpu), &info);
+ rampagesize = getrampagesize();
+ best_page_shift = 0;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < KVM_PPC_PAGE_SIZES_MAX_SZ; i++) {
+ struct kvm_ppc_one_seg_page_size *sps = &info.sps[i];
+
+ if (!sps->page_shift) {
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ if ((sps->page_shift > best_page_shift)
+ && ((1UL << sps->page_shift) <= rampagesize)) {
+ best_page_shift = sps->page_shift;
+ }
+ }
+
return MIN(current_size,
- getrampagesize() << (hash_shift - 7));
+ 1ULL << (best_page_shift + hash_shift - 7));
}
#endif