aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/hw/misc/iotkit-sysctl.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPeter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>2020-11-30 17:07:34 +0000
committerPeter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>2021-02-15 13:16:13 +0000
commit60c860797d55cb3c90c4a77ba0610880e6404d0a (patch)
tree600eba6c8aa30579de848dafdd40096871a59c2b /hw/misc/iotkit-sysctl.c
parentcc14bfc00362220c14082bcc8759863778b4ef0c (diff)
downloadqemu-arm-60c860797d55cb3c90c4a77ba0610880e6404d0a.tar.gz
hw/arm/armsse: Introduce SSE subsystem version property
We model Arm "Subsystems for Embedded" SoC subsystems using generic code which is split into various sub-devices which are configurable by QOM properties to handle the behaviour differences between the SSE subsystems we implement. Currently the only sub-device which needs to change is the IOTKIT_SYSCTL device, and we do this with a mix of properties that directly specify divergent behaviours (eg CPUWAIT_RST) and passing it the SYS_VERSION register value as a way for it to distinguish IoTKit from SSE-200. The "pass SYS_VERSION" approach is already a bit hacky, since the IOTKIT_SYSCTL device has to know that the different part of the register value happens to be bits [31:28]. For SSE-300 this register is renamed SOC_IDENTITY and has a different format entirely, all of whose fields can be configured by the SoC integrator when they integrate the SSE into their SoC, and so "pass SYS_VERSION" breaks down completely. Switch to using a simple integer property representing an internal-to-QEMU enumeration of the SSE flavour. For the moment we only need this in IOTKIT_SYSCTL, but as we add SSE-300 support a few of the other devices will also need to know. We define and permit a value for the SSE-300 so we can start using it in subsequent commits which add SSE-300 support. The now-redundant is_sse200 flag in IoTKitSysCtl will be removed in the following commit. Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> --- I didn't use a full-on qdev/QOM 'enum' property here because that requires messing with the QAPI schema, which seems like overkill for this entirely-internal-to-the-implementation bit of information passing.
Diffstat (limited to 'hw/misc/iotkit-sysctl.c')
-rw-r--r--hw/misc/iotkit-sysctl.c11
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/hw/misc/iotkit-sysctl.c b/hw/misc/iotkit-sysctl.c
index 222511c4b0..34b37fe882 100644
--- a/hw/misc/iotkit-sysctl.c
+++ b/hw/misc/iotkit-sysctl.c
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
#include "hw/registerfields.h"
#include "hw/misc/iotkit-sysctl.h"
#include "hw/qdev-properties.h"
+#include "hw/arm/armsse-version.h"
#include "target/arm/arm-powerctl.h"
#include "target/arm/cpu.h"
@@ -438,10 +439,12 @@ static void iotkit_sysctl_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
{
IoTKitSysCtl *s = IOTKIT_SYSCTL(dev);
- /* The top 4 bits of the SYS_VERSION register tell us if we're an SSE-200 */
- if (extract32(s->sys_version, 28, 4) == 2) {
- s->is_sse200 = true;
+ if (!armsse_version_valid(s->sse_version)) {
+ error_setg(errp, "invalid sse-version value %d", s->sse_version);
+ return;
}
+
+ s->is_sse200 = s->sse_version == ARMSSE_SSE200;
}
static bool sse200_needed(void *opaque)
@@ -493,7 +496,7 @@ static const VMStateDescription iotkit_sysctl_vmstate = {
};
static Property iotkit_sysctl_props[] = {
- DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("SYS_VERSION", IoTKitSysCtl, sys_version, 0),
+ DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("sse-version", IoTKitSysCtl, sse_version, 0),
DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("CPUWAIT_RST", IoTKitSysCtl, cpuwait_rst, 0),
DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("INITSVTOR0_RST", IoTKitSysCtl, initsvtor0_rst,
0x10000000),