aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPeter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>2018-10-08 14:55:02 +0100
committerPeter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>2018-10-08 14:55:02 +0100
commit846690dee8ca6a4143d20b39e894fd1f24627561 (patch)
treef587902a3dd7e65ed55281d325ce0cd09c19f4a0
parentc8a44709861869feff478dac6062f04b7411b04f (diff)
virt: Suppress external aborts on virt-2.10 and earlier
In commit c79c0a314c43b78 we enabled emulation of external aborts when the guest attempts to access a physical address with no mapped device. In commit 4672cbd7bed88dc6 we suppress this for most legacy boards to prevent breakage of previously working guests, but we didn't suppress it in the 'virt' board, with the rationale "we know that guests won't try to prod devices that we don't describe in the device tree or ACPI tables". This is mostly true, but we've had a report of a Linux guest image that this did break. The problem seems to be that the guest is (incorrectly) configured with a DEBUG_UART_PHYS value that tells it there is a uart at 0x10009000 (which is true for vexpress but not for virt), so in early bootup the kernel probes this bogus address. This is a misconfigured guest, so we don't need to worry about it too much, but we can arrange that guests that ran on QEMU v2.10 (before c79c0a314c43b78) will still run on the "virt-2.10" board model, by suppressing external aborts only for that version and earlier. This seems a reasonable compromise: "virt-2.10" is supposed to behave the same way that "virt" did in the 2.10 release, and making it do that provides a usable workaround for guests with bugs like this. Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Message-id: 20180925144127.31965-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
-rw-r--r--hw/arm/virt.c2
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c
index 0b57f87abc..a472566074 100644
--- a/hw/arm/virt.c
+++ b/hw/arm/virt.c
@@ -1926,6 +1926,8 @@ static void virt_machine_2_10_options(MachineClass *mc)
{
virt_machine_2_11_options(mc);
SET_MACHINE_COMPAT(mc, VIRT_COMPAT_2_10);
+ /* before 2.11 we never faulted accesses to bad addresses */
+ mc->ignore_memory_transaction_failures = true;
}
DEFINE_VIRT_MACHINE(2, 10)