From 34bf6ef94a835a8f1d8abd3e7d38c6c08d205867 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dave Hansen Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 13:44:27 -0700 Subject: mm: slab/slub: use page->list consistently instead of page->lru 'struct page' has two list_head fields: 'lru' and 'list'. Conveniently, they are unioned together. This means that code can use them interchangably, which gets horribly confusing like with this nugget from slab.c: > list_del(&page->lru); > if (page->active == cachep->num) > list_add(&page->list, &n->slabs_full); This patch makes the slab and slub code use page->lru universally instead of mixing ->list and ->lru. So, the new rule is: page->lru is what the you use if you want to keep your page on a list. Don't like the fact that it's not called ->list? Too bad. Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen Acked-by: Christoph Lameter Acked-by: David Rientjes Cc: Pekka Enberg Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg --- mm/slab.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'mm/slab.c') diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c index 8dd8e0875e4c..f6718197cdd0 100644 --- a/mm/slab.c +++ b/mm/slab.c @@ -2922,9 +2922,9 @@ retry: /* move slabp to correct slabp list: */ list_del(&page->lru); if (page->active == cachep->num) - list_add(&page->list, &n->slabs_full); + list_add(&page->lru, &n->slabs_full); else - list_add(&page->list, &n->slabs_partial); + list_add(&page->lru, &n->slabs_partial); } must_grow: -- cgit v1.2.3