From 97b59370fa5959d5833a54f303f640d094af3d3c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 21:30:46 -0700 Subject: doc: Fix "struction" typo in RCU memory-ordering documentation This commit replaces "struction" with the correct "structure". Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney --- Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/Tree-RCU-Memory-Ordering.html | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'Documentation/RCU') diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/Tree-RCU-Memory-Ordering.html b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/Tree-RCU-Memory-Ordering.html index a346ce0116eb..e4d94fba6c89 100644 --- a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/Tree-RCU-Memory-Ordering.html +++ b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/Tree-RCU-Memory-Ordering.html @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ The key point is that the lock-acquisition functions, including smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() immediately after successful acquisition of the lock. -

Therefore, for any given rcu_node struction, any access +

Therefore, for any given rcu_node structure, any access happening before one of the above lock-release functions will be seen by all CPUs as happening before any access happening after a later one of the above lock-acquisition functions. -- cgit v1.2.3