aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/crypto/chacha_generic.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2019-07-08Merge branch 'linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/herbert/crypto-2.6 Pull crypto updates from Herbert Xu: "Here is the crypto update for 5.3: API: - Test shash interface directly in testmgr - cra_driver_name is now mandatory Algorithms: - Replace arc4 crypto_cipher with library helper - Implement 5 way interleave for ECB, CBC and CTR on arm64 - Add xxhash - Add continuous self-test on noise source to drbg - Update jitter RNG Drivers: - Add support for SHA204A random number generator - Add support for 7211 in iproc-rng200 - Fix fuzz test failures in inside-secure - Fix fuzz test failures in talitos - Fix fuzz test failures in qat" * 'linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/herbert/crypto-2.6: (143 commits) crypto: stm32/hash - remove interruptible condition for dma crypto: stm32/hash - Fix hmac issue more than 256 bytes crypto: stm32/crc32 - rename driver file crypto: amcc - remove memset after dma_alloc_coherent crypto: ccp - Switch to SPDX license identifiers crypto: ccp - Validate the the error value used to index error messages crypto: doc - Fix formatting of new crypto engine content crypto: doc - Add parameter documentation crypto: arm64/aes-ce - implement 5 way interleave for ECB, CBC and CTR crypto: arm64/aes-ce - add 5 way interleave routines crypto: talitos - drop icv_ool crypto: talitos - fix hash on SEC1. crypto: talitos - move struct talitos_edesc into talitos.h lib/scatterlist: Fix mapping iterator when sg->offset is greater than PAGE_SIZE crypto/NX: Set receive window credits to max number of CRBs in RxFIFO crypto: asymmetric_keys - select CRYPTO_HASH where needed crypto: serpent - mark __serpent_setkey_sbox noinline crypto: testmgr - dynamically allocate crypto_shash crypto: testmgr - dynamically allocate testvec_config crypto: talitos - eliminate unneeded 'done' functions at build time ...
2019-06-13crypto: chacha - constify ctx and iv argumentsEric Biggers
Constify the ctx and iv arguments to crypto_chacha_init() and the various chacha*_stream_xor() functions. This makes it clear that they are not modified. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2019-05-30treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 152Thomas Gleixner
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s): this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at your option any later version extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier GPL-2.0-or-later has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 3029 file(s). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net> Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190527070032.746973796@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-04-18crypto: run initcalls for generic implementations earlierEric Biggers
Use subsys_initcall for registration of all templates and generic algorithm implementations, rather than module_init. Then change cryptomgr to use arch_initcall, to place it before the subsys_initcalls. This is needed so that when both a generic and optimized implementation of an algorithm are built into the kernel (not loadable modules), the generic implementation is registered before the optimized one. Otherwise, the self-tests for the optimized implementation are unable to allocate the generic implementation for the new comparison fuzz tests. Note that on arm, a side effect of this change is that self-tests for generic implementations may run before the unaligned access handler has been installed. So, unaligned accesses will crash the kernel. This is arguably a good thing as it makes it easier to detect that type of bug. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2019-03-22crypto: chacha-generic - use crypto_xor_cpy()Eric Biggers
In chacha_docrypt(), use crypto_xor_cpy() instead of crypto_xor(). This avoids having to memcpy() the src buffer to the dst buffer. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2019-03-22crypto: chacha-generic - fix use as arm64 no-NEON fallbackEric Biggers
The arm64 implementations of ChaCha and XChaCha are failing the extra crypto self-tests following my patches to test the !may_use_simd() code paths, which previously were untested. The problem is as follows: When !may_use_simd(), the arm64 NEON implementations fall back to the generic implementation, which uses the skcipher_walk API to iterate through the src/dst scatterlists. Due to how the skcipher_walk API works, walk.stride is set from the skcipher_alg actually being used, which in this case is the arm64 NEON algorithm. Thus walk.stride is 5*CHACHA_BLOCK_SIZE, not CHACHA_BLOCK_SIZE. This unnecessarily large stride shouldn't cause an actual problem. However, the generic implementation computes round_down(nbytes, walk.stride). round_down() assumes the round amount is a power of 2, which 5*CHACHA_BLOCK_SIZE is not, so it gives the wrong result. This causes the following case in skcipher_walk_done() to be hit, causing a WARN() and failing the encryption operation: if (WARN_ON(err)) { /* unexpected case; didn't process all bytes */ err = -EINVAL; goto finish; } Fix it by rounding down to CHACHA_BLOCK_SIZE instead of walk.stride. (Or we could replace round_down() with rounddown(), but that would add a slow division operation every time, which I think we should avoid.) Fixes: 2fe55987b262 ("crypto: arm64/chacha - use combined SIMD/ALU routine for more speed") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.0+ Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2018-11-20crypto: chacha - add XChaCha12 supportEric Biggers
Now that the generic implementation of ChaCha20 has been refactored to allow varying the number of rounds, add support for XChaCha12, which is the XSalsa construction applied to ChaCha12. ChaCha12 is one of the three ciphers specified by the original ChaCha paper (https://cr.yp.to/chacha/chacha-20080128.pdf: "ChaCha, a variant of Salsa20"), alongside ChaCha8 and ChaCha20. ChaCha12 is faster than ChaCha20 but has a lower, but still large, security margin. We need XChaCha12 support so that it can be used in the Adiantum encryption mode, which enables disk/file encryption on low-end mobile devices where AES-XTS is too slow as the CPUs lack AES instructions. We'd prefer XChaCha20 (the more popular variant), but it's too slow on some of our target devices, so at least in some cases we do need the XChaCha12-based version. In more detail, the problem is that Adiantum is still much slower than we're happy with, and encryption still has a quite noticeable effect on the feel of low-end devices. Users and vendors push back hard against encryption that degrades the user experience, which always risks encryption being disabled entirely. So we need to choose the fastest option that gives us a solid margin of security, and here that's XChaCha12. The best known attack on ChaCha breaks only 7 rounds and has 2^235 time complexity, so ChaCha12's security margin is still better than AES-256's. Much has been learned about cryptanalysis of ARX ciphers since Salsa20 was originally designed in 2005, and it now seems we can be comfortable with a smaller number of rounds. The eSTREAM project also suggests the 12-round version of Salsa20 as providing the best balance among the different variants: combining very good performance with a "comfortable margin of security". Note that it would be trivial to add vanilla ChaCha12 in addition to XChaCha12. However, it's unneeded for now and therefore is omitted. As discussed in the patch that introduced XChaCha20 support, I considered splitting the code into separate chacha-common, chacha20, xchacha20, and xchacha12 modules, so that these algorithms could be enabled/disabled independently. However, since nearly all the code is shared anyway, I ultimately decided there would have been little benefit to the added complexity. Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Acked-by: Martin Willi <martin@strongswan.org> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2018-11-20crypto: chacha20-generic - refactor to allow varying number of roundsEric Biggers
In preparation for adding XChaCha12 support, rename/refactor chacha20-generic to support different numbers of rounds. The justification for needing XChaCha12 support is explained in more detail in the patch "crypto: chacha - add XChaCha12 support". The only difference between ChaCha{8,12,20} are the number of rounds itself; all other parts of the algorithm are the same. Therefore, remove the "20" from all definitions, structures, functions, files, etc. that will be shared by all ChaCha versions. Also make ->setkey() store the round count in the chacha_ctx (previously chacha20_ctx). The generic code then passes the round count through to chacha_block(). There will be a ->setkey() function for each explicitly allowed round count; the encrypt/decrypt functions will be the same. I decided not to do it the opposite way (same ->setkey() function for all round counts, with different encrypt/decrypt functions) because that would have required more boilerplate code in architecture-specific implementations of ChaCha and XChaCha. Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Acked-by: Martin Willi <martin@strongswan.org> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>