| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Since Poly1305 requires a nonce per invocation, the Linux kernel
implementations of Poly1305 don't use the crypto API's keying mechanism
and instead expect the key and nonce as the first 32 bytes of the data.
But ->setkey() is still defined as a stub returning an error code. This
prevents Poly1305 from being used through AF_ALG and will also break it
completely once we start enforcing that all crypto API users (not just
AF_ALG) call ->setkey() if present.
Fix it by removing crypto_poly1305_setkey(), leaving ->setkey as NULL.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
crypto_poly1305_final() no longer requires a cra_alignmask, and nothing
else in the x86 poly1305-simd implementation does either. So remove the
cra_alignmask so that the crypto API does not have to unnecessarily
align the buffers.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1459801503-15600-4-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1459801503-15600-2-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1459266123-21878-8-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
There are two concepts that have some confusing naming:
1. Extended State Component numbers (currently called
XFEATURE_BIT_*)
2. Extended State Component masks (currently called XSTATE_*)
The numbers are (currently) from 0-9. State component 3 is the
bounds registers for MPX, for instance.
But when we want to enable "state component 3", we go set a bit
in XCR0. The bit we set is 1<<3. We can check to see if a
state component feature is enabled by looking at its bit.
The current 'xfeature_bit's are at best xfeature bit _numbers_.
Calling them bits is at best inconsistent with ending the enum
list with 'XFEATURES_NR_MAX'.
This patch renames the enum to be 'xfeature'. These also
happen to be what the Intel documentation calls a "state
component".
We also want to differentiate these from the "XSTATE_*" macros.
The "XSTATE_*" macros are a mask, and we rename them to match.
These macros are reasonably widely used so this patch is a
wee bit big, but this really is just a rename.
The only non-mechanical part of this is the
s/XSTATE_EXTEND_MASK/XFEATURE_MASK_EXTEND/
We need a better name for it, but that's another patch.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: dave@sr71.net
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150902233126.38653250@viggo.jf.intel.com
[ Ported to v4.3-rc1. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
Extends the x86_64 Poly1305 authenticator by a function processing four
consecutive Poly1305 blocks in parallel using AVX2 instructions.
For large messages, throughput increases by ~15-45% compared to two
block SSE2:
testing speed of poly1305 (poly1305-simd)
test 0 ( 96 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 6 updates): 3809514 opers/sec, 365713411 bytes/sec
test 1 ( 96 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 3 updates): 5973423 opers/sec, 573448627 bytes/sec
test 2 ( 96 byte blocks, 96 bytes per update, 1 updates): 9446779 opers/sec, 906890803 bytes/sec
test 3 ( 288 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 18 updates): 1364814 opers/sec, 393066691 bytes/sec
test 4 ( 288 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 9 updates): 2045780 opers/sec, 589184697 bytes/sec
test 5 ( 288 byte blocks, 288 bytes per update, 1 updates): 3711946 opers/sec, 1069040592 bytes/sec
test 6 ( 1056 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 33 updates): 573686 opers/sec, 605812732 bytes/sec
test 7 ( 1056 byte blocks, 1056 bytes per update, 1 updates): 1647802 opers/sec, 1740079440 bytes/sec
test 8 ( 2080 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 65 updates): 292970 opers/sec, 609378224 bytes/sec
test 9 ( 2080 byte blocks, 2080 bytes per update, 1 updates): 943229 opers/sec, 1961916528 bytes/sec
test 10 ( 4128 byte blocks, 4128 bytes per update, 1 updates): 494623 opers/sec, 2041804569 bytes/sec
test 11 ( 8224 byte blocks, 8224 bytes per update, 1 updates): 254045 opers/sec, 2089271014 bytes/sec
testing speed of poly1305 (poly1305-simd)
test 0 ( 96 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 6 updates): 3826224 opers/sec, 367317552 bytes/sec
test 1 ( 96 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 3 updates): 5948638 opers/sec, 571069267 bytes/sec
test 2 ( 96 byte blocks, 96 bytes per update, 1 updates): 9439110 opers/sec, 906154627 bytes/sec
test 3 ( 288 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 18 updates): 1367756 opers/sec, 393913872 bytes/sec
test 4 ( 288 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 9 updates): 2056881 opers/sec, 592381958 bytes/sec
test 5 ( 288 byte blocks, 288 bytes per update, 1 updates): 3711153 opers/sec, 1068812179 bytes/sec
test 6 ( 1056 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 33 updates): 574940 opers/sec, 607136745 bytes/sec
test 7 ( 1056 byte blocks, 1056 bytes per update, 1 updates): 1948830 opers/sec, 2057964585 bytes/sec
test 8 ( 2080 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 65 updates): 293308 opers/sec, 610082096 bytes/sec
test 9 ( 2080 byte blocks, 2080 bytes per update, 1 updates): 1235224 opers/sec, 2569267792 bytes/sec
test 10 ( 4128 byte blocks, 4128 bytes per update, 1 updates): 684405 opers/sec, 2825226316 bytes/sec
test 11 ( 8224 byte blocks, 8224 bytes per update, 1 updates): 367101 opers/sec, 3019039446 bytes/sec
Benchmark results from a Core i5-4670T.
Signed-off-by: Martin Willi <martin@strongswan.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
Extends the x86_64 SSE2 Poly1305 authenticator by a function processing two
consecutive Poly1305 blocks in parallel using a derived key r^2. Loop
unrolling can be more effectively mapped to SSE instructions, further
increasing throughput.
For large messages, throughput increases by ~45-65% compared to single
block SSE2:
testing speed of poly1305 (poly1305-simd)
test 0 ( 96 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 6 updates): 3790063 opers/sec, 363846076 bytes/sec
test 1 ( 96 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 3 updates): 5913378 opers/sec, 567684355 bytes/sec
test 2 ( 96 byte blocks, 96 bytes per update, 1 updates): 9352574 opers/sec, 897847104 bytes/sec
test 3 ( 288 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 18 updates): 1362145 opers/sec, 392297990 bytes/sec
test 4 ( 288 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 9 updates): 2007075 opers/sec, 578037628 bytes/sec
test 5 ( 288 byte blocks, 288 bytes per update, 1 updates): 3709811 opers/sec, 1068425798 bytes/sec
test 6 ( 1056 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 33 updates): 566272 opers/sec, 597984182 bytes/sec
test 7 ( 1056 byte blocks, 1056 bytes per update, 1 updates): 1111657 opers/sec, 1173910108 bytes/sec
test 8 ( 2080 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 65 updates): 288857 opers/sec, 600823808 bytes/sec
test 9 ( 2080 byte blocks, 2080 bytes per update, 1 updates): 590746 opers/sec, 1228751888 bytes/sec
test 10 ( 4128 byte blocks, 4128 bytes per update, 1 updates): 301825 opers/sec, 1245936902 bytes/sec
test 11 ( 8224 byte blocks, 8224 bytes per update, 1 updates): 153075 opers/sec, 1258896201 bytes/sec
testing speed of poly1305 (poly1305-simd)
test 0 ( 96 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 6 updates): 3809514 opers/sec, 365713411 bytes/sec
test 1 ( 96 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 3 updates): 5973423 opers/sec, 573448627 bytes/sec
test 2 ( 96 byte blocks, 96 bytes per update, 1 updates): 9446779 opers/sec, 906890803 bytes/sec
test 3 ( 288 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 18 updates): 1364814 opers/sec, 393066691 bytes/sec
test 4 ( 288 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 9 updates): 2045780 opers/sec, 589184697 bytes/sec
test 5 ( 288 byte blocks, 288 bytes per update, 1 updates): 3711946 opers/sec, 1069040592 bytes/sec
test 6 ( 1056 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 33 updates): 573686 opers/sec, 605812732 bytes/sec
test 7 ( 1056 byte blocks, 1056 bytes per update, 1 updates): 1647802 opers/sec, 1740079440 bytes/sec
test 8 ( 2080 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 65 updates): 292970 opers/sec, 609378224 bytes/sec
test 9 ( 2080 byte blocks, 2080 bytes per update, 1 updates): 943229 opers/sec, 1961916528 bytes/sec
test 10 ( 4128 byte blocks, 4128 bytes per update, 1 updates): 494623 opers/sec, 2041804569 bytes/sec
test 11 ( 8224 byte blocks, 8224 bytes per update, 1 updates): 254045 opers/sec, 2089271014 bytes/sec
Benchmark results from a Core i5-4670T.
Signed-off-by: Martin Willi <martin@strongswan.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
Implements an x86_64 assembler driver for the Poly1305 authenticator. This
single block variant holds the 130-bit integer in 5 32-bit words, but uses
SSE to do two multiplications/additions in parallel.
When calling updates with small blocks, the overhead for kernel_fpu_begin/
kernel_fpu_end() negates the perfmance gain. We therefore use the
poly1305-generic fallback for small updates.
For large messages, throughput increases by ~5-10% compared to
poly1305-generic:
testing speed of poly1305 (poly1305-generic)
test 0 ( 96 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 6 updates): 4080026 opers/sec, 391682496 bytes/sec
test 1 ( 96 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 3 updates): 6221094 opers/sec, 597225024 bytes/sec
test 2 ( 96 byte blocks, 96 bytes per update, 1 updates): 9609750 opers/sec, 922536057 bytes/sec
test 3 ( 288 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 18 updates): 1459379 opers/sec, 420301267 bytes/sec
test 4 ( 288 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 9 updates): 2115179 opers/sec, 609171609 bytes/sec
test 5 ( 288 byte blocks, 288 bytes per update, 1 updates): 3729874 opers/sec, 1074203856 bytes/sec
test 6 ( 1056 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 33 updates): 593000 opers/sec, 626208000 bytes/sec
test 7 ( 1056 byte blocks, 1056 bytes per update, 1 updates): 1081536 opers/sec, 1142102332 bytes/sec
test 8 ( 2080 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 65 updates): 302077 opers/sec, 628320576 bytes/sec
test 9 ( 2080 byte blocks, 2080 bytes per update, 1 updates): 554384 opers/sec, 1153120176 bytes/sec
test 10 ( 4128 byte blocks, 4128 bytes per update, 1 updates): 278715 opers/sec, 1150536345 bytes/sec
test 11 ( 8224 byte blocks, 8224 bytes per update, 1 updates): 140202 opers/sec, 1153022070 bytes/sec
testing speed of poly1305 (poly1305-simd)
test 0 ( 96 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 6 updates): 3790063 opers/sec, 363846076 bytes/sec
test 1 ( 96 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 3 updates): 5913378 opers/sec, 567684355 bytes/sec
test 2 ( 96 byte blocks, 96 bytes per update, 1 updates): 9352574 opers/sec, 897847104 bytes/sec
test 3 ( 288 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 18 updates): 1362145 opers/sec, 392297990 bytes/sec
test 4 ( 288 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 9 updates): 2007075 opers/sec, 578037628 bytes/sec
test 5 ( 288 byte blocks, 288 bytes per update, 1 updates): 3709811 opers/sec, 1068425798 bytes/sec
test 6 ( 1056 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 33 updates): 566272 opers/sec, 597984182 bytes/sec
test 7 ( 1056 byte blocks, 1056 bytes per update, 1 updates): 1111657 opers/sec, 1173910108 bytes/sec
test 8 ( 2080 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 65 updates): 288857 opers/sec, 600823808 bytes/sec
test 9 ( 2080 byte blocks, 2080 bytes per update, 1 updates): 590746 opers/sec, 1228751888 bytes/sec
test 10 ( 4128 byte blocks, 4128 bytes per update, 1 updates): 301825 opers/sec, 1245936902 bytes/sec
test 11 ( 8224 byte blocks, 8224 bytes per update, 1 updates): 153075 opers/sec, 1258896201 bytes/sec
Benchmark results from a Core i5-4670T.
Signed-off-by: Martin Willi <martin@strongswan.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
