From 6b4a35fc19a9229080dead8a9c316e8857b3e94d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wang Long <long.wanglong@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 15:37:22 -0700
Subject: lib/test_kasan.c: make kmalloc_oob_krealloc_less more correctly

In kmalloc_oob_krealloc_less, I think it is better to test
the size2 boundary.

If we do not call krealloc, the access of position size1 will still cause
out-of-bounds and access of position size2 does not.  After call krealloc,
the access of position size2 cause out-of-bounds.  So using size2 is more
correct.

Signed-off-by: Wang Long <long.wanglong@huawei.com>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---
 lib/test_kasan.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'lib/test_kasan.c')

diff --git a/lib/test_kasan.c b/lib/test_kasan.c
index 044c54dd43fd..c1efb1b61017 100644
--- a/lib/test_kasan.c
+++ b/lib/test_kasan.c
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static noinline void __init kmalloc_oob_krealloc_less(void)
 		kfree(ptr1);
 		return;
 	}
-	ptr2[size1] = 'x';
+	ptr2[size2] = 'x';
 	kfree(ptr2);
 }
 
-- 
cgit v1.2.3