From 17cf22c33e1f1b5e435469c84e43872579497653 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Eric W. Biederman" Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 14:51:53 -0800 Subject: pidns: Use task_active_pid_ns where appropriate The expressions tsk->nsproxy->pid_ns and task_active_pid_ns aka ns_of_pid(task_pid(tsk)) should have the same number of cache line misses with the practical difference that ns_of_pid(task_pid(tsk)) is released later in a processes life. Furthermore by using task_active_pid_ns it becomes trivial to write an unshare implementation for the the pid namespace. So I have used task_active_pid_ns everywhere I can. In fork since the pid has not yet been attached to the process I use ns_of_pid, to achieve the same effect. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman --- kernel/signal.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'kernel/signal.c') diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c index 0af8868525d6..b2445d86f226 100644 --- a/kernel/signal.c +++ b/kernel/signal.c @@ -1752,7 +1752,7 @@ static void do_notify_parent_cldstop(struct task_struct *tsk, * see comment in do_notify_parent() about the following 4 lines */ rcu_read_lock(); - info.si_pid = task_pid_nr_ns(tsk, parent->nsproxy->pid_ns); + info.si_pid = task_pid_nr_ns(tsk, task_active_pid_ns(parent)); info.si_uid = from_kuid_munged(task_cred_xxx(parent, user_ns), task_uid(tsk)); rcu_read_unlock(); -- cgit v1.2.3