From e6250f868ccc8a609c88524a785a6e0d915ad3cb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Neal Cardwell Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 20:26:46 -0400 Subject: tcp: fix FRTO undo on cumulative ACK of SACKed range [ Upstream commit 666b805150efd62f05810ff0db08f44a2370c937 ] On processing cumulative ACKs, the FRTO code was not checking the SACKed bit, meaning that there could be a spurious FRTO undo on a cumulative ACK of a previously SACKed skb. The FRTO code should only consider a cumulative ACK to indicate that an original/unretransmitted skb is newly ACKed if the skb was not yet SACKed. The effect of the spurious FRTO undo would typically be to make the connection think that all previously-sent packets were in flight when they really weren't, leading to a stall and an RTO. Signed-off-by: Neal Cardwell Signed-off-by: Yuchung Cheng Fixes: e33099f96d99c ("tcp: implement RFC5682 F-RTO") Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c index 22917918fa80..9fbd69efa999 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c @@ -3064,10 +3064,11 @@ static int tcp_clean_rtx_queue(struct sock *sk, int prior_fackets, if (seq_rtt < 0) { seq_rtt = ca_seq_rtt; } - if (!(sacked & TCPCB_SACKED_ACKED)) + if (!(sacked & TCPCB_SACKED_ACKED)) { reord = min(pkts_acked, reord); - if (!after(scb->end_seq, tp->high_seq)) - flag |= FLAG_ORIG_SACK_ACKED; + if (!after(scb->end_seq, tp->high_seq)) + flag |= FLAG_ORIG_SACK_ACKED; + } } if (sacked & TCPCB_SACKED_ACKED) -- cgit v1.2.3