aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/acpi/internal.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2014-10-10ACPI / fan: use acpi_device_xxx_power instead of acpi_bus equivelantAaron Lu
When we have the acpi_device pointer, there is no need to pass the device's handle to the acpi_bus_xxx_power functions to get/set/update the device's power state, instead, use the acpi_device_xxx_power functions directly. To make this happen for fan module, export acpi_device_update_power. Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
2014-10-10ACPI: make acpi_create_platform_device() an external APIZhang Rui
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
2014-09-11ACPI: introduce ACPI int340x thermal scan handlerZhang Rui
Newer laptops and tablets that use ACPI may have thermal sensors and other devices with thermal control capabilities outside the core CPU/SOC, for thermal safety reasons. They are exposed for the OS to use via 1) INT3400 ACPI device object as the master. 2) INT3401 ~ INT340B ACPI device objects as the slaves. This patch introduces a scan handler to enumerate the INT3400 ACPI device object to platform bus, and prevent its slaves from being enumerated before the controller driver being probed. Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
2014-07-27Merge branches 'acpi-pnp' and 'acpi-pci'Rafael J. Wysocki
* acpi-pnp: ACPI / PNP: Use ACPI_COMPANION() instead of ACPI_HANDLE() ACPI / PNP: do ACPI binding directly * acpi-pci: ACPI / PCI: Use ACPI_COMPANION() instead of ACPI_HANDLE()
2014-07-21ACPI / processor: Introduce ARCH_MIGHT_HAVE_ACPI_PDCHanjun Guo
The use of _PDC is deprecated in ACPI 3.0 in favor of _OSC, as ARM platform is supported only in ACPI 5.0 or higher version, _PDC will not be used in ARM platform, so make Make _PDC only for platforms with Intel CPUs. Introduce ARCH_MIGHT_HAVE_ACPI_PDC and move _PDC related code in ACPI processor driver into a single file processor_pdc.c, make x86 and ia64 select it when ACPI is enabled. This patch also use pr_* to replace printk to fix the checkpatch warning and factor acpi_processor_alloc_pdc() a little bit to avoid duplicate pr_err() code. Suggested-by: Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-07-07ACPI / PNP: do ACPI binding directlyZhang Rui
PNPACPI uses acpi_bus_type to do ACPI binding for the PNPACPI devices. This is overkill because PNPACPI code already knows which ACPI device object to bind during PNPACPI device enumeration. This patch removes acpi_pnp_bus and does the binding by invoking acpi_bind_one() directly after device enumerated. This also fixes a bug in the previous code that some PNPACPI devices failed to be bound because 1. the ACPI device _HID is not pnpid, e.g. "MSFT0001", but its _CID is, e.g. "PNP0303", thus ACPI _CID is used as the pnp device device id. 2. device is bound only if the pnp device id matches the ACPI device _HID. Tested-by: Prigent Christophe <christophe.prigent@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-05-30ACPI / scan: always register ACPI LPSS scan handlerRafael J. Wysocki
Prevent platform devices from being created for ACPI LPSS devices if CONFIG_X86_INTEL_LPSS is unset by compiling out the LPSS scan handler's callbacks only in that case and still compiling its device ID list in and registering the scan handler in either case. This change is based on a prototype from Zhang Rui. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2014-05-30ACPI / scan: always register memory hotplug scan handlerRafael J. Wysocki
Prevent platform devices from being created for ACPI memory device objects if CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_MEMORY is unset by compiling out the memory hotplug scan handler's callbacks only in that case and still compiling its device ID list in and registering the scan handler in either case. Also unset the memory hotplug scan handler's .attach() callback if acpi_no_memhotplug is set, but still register the scan handler to avoid creating platform devices for ACPI memory devices in that case too. This change is based on a prototype from Zhang Rui. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2014-05-30ACPI / scan: always register container scan handlerRafael J. Wysocki
Prevent platform devices from being created for ACPI containers if CONFIG_ACPI_CONTAINER is unset by compiling out the container scan handler's callbacks only in that case and still compiling its device ID list in and registering the scan handler in either case. This change is based on a prototype from Zhang Rui. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2014-05-30ACPI / PNP: use device ID list for PNPACPI device enumerationZhang Rui
ACPI can be used to enumerate PNP devices, but the code does not handle this in the right way currently. Namely, if an ACPI device object 1. Has a _CRS method, 2. Has an identification of "three capital characters followed by four hex digits", 3. Is not in the excluded IDs list, it will be enumerated to PNP bus (that is, a PNP device object will be create for it). This means that, actually, the PNP bus type is used as the default bus type for enumerating _HID devices in ACPI. However, more and more _HID devices need to be enumerated to the platform bus instead (that is, platform device objects need to be created for them). As a result, the device ID list in acpi_platform.c is used to enforce creating platform device objects rather than PNP device objects for matching devices. That list has been continuously growing recently, unfortunately, and it is pretty much guaranteed to grow even more in the future. To address that problem it is better to enumerate _HID devices as platform devices by default. To this end, change the way of enumerating PNP devices by adding a PNP ACPI scan handler that will use a device ID list to create PNP devices for the ACPI device objects whose device IDs are present in that list. The initial device ID list in the PNP ACPI scan handler contains all of the pnp_device_id strings from all the existing PNP drivers, so this change should be transparent to the PNP core and all of the PNP drivers. Still, in the future it should be possible to reduce its size by converting PNP drivers that need not be PNP for any technical reasons into platform drivers. Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> [rjw: Rewrote the changelog, modified the PNP ACPI scan handler code] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2014-05-25ACPI / platform / LPSS: Enable async suspend/resume of LPSS devicesRafael J. Wysocki
To seed up suspend and resume of devices included into Intel SoCs handled by the ACPI LPSS driver during system suspend, make acpi_lpss_create_device() call device_enable_async_suspend() for every device created by it. This requires acpi_create_platform_device() to be modified to return a pointer to struct platform_device instead of an int. As a result, acpi_create_platform_device() cannot be pointed to by the .attach pointer in platform_handler directly any more, so a simple wrapper around it is necessary for this purpose. That, in turn, allows the second unused argument of acpi_create_platform_device() to be dropped, which is an improvement. Tested-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-03-05ACPI / hotplug: Rework deferred execution of acpi_device_hotplug()Rafael J. Wysocki
Since the only function executed by acpi_hotplug_execute() is acpi_device_hotplug() and it only is called by the ACPI core, simplify its definition so that it only takes two arguments, the ACPI device object pointer and event code, rename it to acpi_hotplug_schedule() and move its header from acpi_bus.h to the ACPI core's internal header file internal.h. Modify the definition of acpi_device_hotplug() so that its first argument is an ACPI device object pointer and modify the definition of struct acpi_hp_work accordingly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2014-02-16ACPI / dock: Pass ACPI device pointer to acpi_device_is_battery()Rafael J. Wysocki
Since we already know what the device's PNP IDs are when acpi_device_is_battery() is called, it is not necessary to run acpi_get_object_info() for the device in that function. Instead, if acpi_device_is_battery() is passed a pointer to a struct acpi_device object, it can use the list of PNP IDs from that object, so make that happen and modify the function's header accordingly Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-02-16ACPI / dock: Dispatch dock notifications from the global notify handlerRafael J. Wysocki
The ACPI dock station code carries out an extra namespace scan before the main one in order to find and register all of the dock device objects. Then, it registers a notify handler for each of them for handling dock events. However, dock device objects need not be scanned for upfront. They very well can be enumerated and registered during the first phase of the main namespace scan, before attaching scan handlers and ACPI drivers to ACPI device objects. Then, the dependent devices can be added to the in the second phase. That makes it possible to drop the extra namespace scan, so do it. Moreover, it is not necessary to register notify handlers for all of the dock stations' namespace nodes, becuase notifications may be dispatched from the global notify handler for them. Do that and drop two functions used for dock notify handling, acpi_dock_deferred_cb() and dock_notify_handler(), that aren't necessary any more. Finally, some dock station objects have _HID objects matching the ACPI container scan handler which causes it to claim those objects and try to handle their hotplug, but that is not a good idea, because those objects have their own special hotplug handling anyway. For this reason, the hotplug_notify flag should not be set for ACPI device objects representing dock stations and the container scan handler should be made ignore those objects, so make that happen. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-02-06ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Hotplug notifications from acpi_bus_notify()Rafael J. Wysocki
Since acpi_bus_notify() is executed on all notifications for all devices anyway, make it execute acpi_device_hotplug() for all hotplug events instead of installing notify handlers pointing to the same function for all hotplug devices. This change reduces both the size and complexity of ACPI-based device hotplug code. Moreover, since acpi_device_hotplug() only does significant things for devices that have either an ACPI scan handler, or a hotplug context with .eject() defined, and those devices had notify handlers pointing to acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() installed before anyway, this modification shouldn't change functionality. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-01-12Merge branch 'acpi-hotplug'Rafael J. Wysocki
* acpi-hotplug: ACPI / scan: ACPI device object sysfs attribute for _STA evaluation ACPI / hotplug / driver core: Handle containers in a special way ACPI / hotplug: Add demand_offline hotplug profile flag ACPI / bind: Move acpi_get_child() to drivers/ide/ide-acpi.c ACPI / bind: Pass struct acpi_device pointer to acpi_bind_one() ACPI / bind: Rework struct acpi_bus_type ACPI / bind: Redefine acpi_preset_companion() ACPI / bind: Redefine acpi_get_child() PCI / ACPI: Use acpi_find_child_device() for child devices lookup ACPI / bind: Simplify child device lookups ACPI / scan: Use direct recurrence for device hierarchy walks ACPI: Introduce acpi_set_device_status() ACPI / hotplug: Drop unfinished global notification handling routines ACPI / hotplug: Rework generic code to handle suprise removals ACPI / hotplug: Move container-specific code out of the core ACPI / hotplug: Make ACPI PCI root hotplug use common hotplug code ACPI / hotplug: Introduce common hotplug function acpi_device_hotplug() ACPI / hotplug: Do not fail bus and device checks for disabled hotplug ACPI / scan: Add acpi_device objects for all device nodes in the namespace ACPI / scan: Define non-empty device removal handler
2014-01-06ACPI / EC: Remove unused functions and add prototype declaration in internal.hRashika
Adds the prototype declarations of functions acpi_ec_add_query_handler() and acpi_ec_remove_query_handler() in header file internal.h and removes unused functions ec_burst_enable() and ec_burst_disable() in ec.c. This eliminates the following warnings in ec.c: drivers/acpi/ec.c:393:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘ec_burst_enable’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] drivers/acpi/ec.c:402:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘ec_burst_disable’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] drivers/acpi/ec.c:531:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘acpi_ec_add_query_handler’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] drivers/acpi/ec.c:552:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘acpi_ec_remove_query_handler’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] Signed-off-by: Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-12-29ACPI / hotplug / driver core: Handle containers in a special wayRafael J. Wysocki
ACPI container devices require special hotplug handling, at least on some systems, since generally user space needs to carry out system-specific cleanup before it makes sense to offline devices in the container. However, the current ACPI hotplug code for containers first attempts to offline devices in the container and only then it notifies user space of the container offline. Moreover, after commit 202317a573b2 (ACPI / scan: Add acpi_device objects for all device nodes in the namespace), ACPI device objects representing containers are present as long as the ACPI namespace nodes corresponding to them are present, which may be forever, even if the container devices are physically detached from the system (the return values of the corresponding _STA methods change in those cases, but generally the namespace nodes themselves are still there). Thus it is useful to introduce entities representing containers that will go away during container hot-unplug. The goal of this change is to address both the above issues. The idea is to create a "companion" container system device for each of the ACPI container device objects during the initial namespace scan or on a hotplug event making the container present. That system device will be unregistered on container removal. A new bus type for container devices is added for this purpose, because device offline and online operations need to be defined for them. The online operation is a trivial function that is always successful and the offline uses a callback pointed to by the container device's offline member. For ACPI containers that callback simply walks the list of ACPI device objects right below the container object (its children) and checks if all of their physical companion devices are offline. If that's not the case, it returns -EBUSY and the container system devivce cannot be put offline. Consequently, to put the container system device offline, it is necessary to put all of the physical devices depending on its ACPI companion object offline beforehand. Container system devices created for ACPI container objects are initially online. They are created by the container ACPI scan handler whose hotplug.demand_offline flag is set. That causes acpi_scan_hot_remove() to check if the companion container system device is offline before attempting to remove an ACPI container or any devices below it. If the check fails, a KOBJ_CHANGE uevent is emitted for the container system device in question and user space is expected to offline all devices below the container and the container itself in response to it. Then, user space can finalize the removal of the container with the help of its ACPI device object's eject attribute in sysfs. Tested-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2013-12-07ACPI / bind: Pass struct acpi_device pointer to acpi_bind_one()Rafael J. Wysocki
There is no reason to pass an ACPI handle to acpi_bind_one() instead of a struct acpi_device pointer to the target device object, so modify that function to take a struct acpi_device pointer as its second argument and update all code depending on it accordingly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> # for USB/ACPI
2013-11-22ACPI / hotplug: Make ACPI PCI root hotplug use common hotplug codeRafael J. Wysocki
Rework the common ACPI device hotplug code so that it is suitable for PCI host bridge hotplug and switch the PCI host bridge scan handler to using the common hotplug code. This allows quite a few lines of code that are not necessary any more to be dropped from the PCI host bridge scan handler and removes arbitrary differences in behavior between PCI host bridge hotplug and ACPI-based hotplug of other components, like CPUs and memory. Also acpi_device_hotplug() can be static now. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2013-11-22ACPI / hotplug: Introduce common hotplug function acpi_device_hotplug()Rafael J. Wysocki
Modify the common ACPI device hotplug code to always queue up the same function, acpi_device_hotplug(), using acpi_hotplug_execute() and make the PCI host bridge hotplug code use that function too for device hot removal. This allows some code duplication to be reduced and a race condition where the relevant ACPI handle may become invalid between the notification handler and the function queued up by it via acpi_hotplug_execute() to be avoided. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2013-11-22ACPI / scan: Add acpi_device objects for all device nodes in the namespaceRafael J. Wysocki
Modify the ACPI namespace scanning code to register a struct acpi_device object for every namespace node representing a device, processor and so on, even if the device represented by that namespace node is reported to be not present and not functional by _STA. There are multiple reasons to do that. First of all, it avoids quite a lot of overhead when struct acpi_device objects are deleted every time acpi_bus_trim() is run and then added again by a subsequent acpi_bus_scan() for the same scope, although the namespace objects they correspond to stay in memory all the time (which always is the case on a vast majority of systems). Second, it will allow user space to see that there are namespace nodes representing devices that are not present at the moment and may be added to the system. It will also allow user space to evaluate _SUN for those nodes to check what physical slots the "missing" devices may be put into and it will make sense to add a sysfs attribute for _STA evaluation after this change (that will be useful for thermal management on some systems). Next, it will help to consolidate the ACPI hotplug handling among subsystems by making it possible to store hotplug-related information in struct acpi_device objects in a standard common way. Finally, it will help to avoid a race condition related to the deletion of ACPI namespace nodes. Namely, namespace nodes may be deleted as a result of a table unload triggered by _EJ0 or _DCK. If a hotplug notification for one of those nodes is triggered right before the deletion and it executes a hotplug callback via acpi_hotplug_execute(), the ACPI handle passed to that callback may be stale when the callback actually runs. One way to work around that is to always pass struct acpi_device pointers to hotplug callbacks after doing a get_device() on the objects in question which eliminates the use-after-free possibility (the ACPI handles in those objects are invalidated by acpi_scan_drop_device(), so they will trigger ACPICA errors on attempts to use them). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2013-11-22ACPI / scan: Define non-empty device removal handlerRafael J. Wysocki
If an ACPI namespace node is removed (usually, as a result of a table unload), and there is a data object attached to that node, acpi_ns_delete_node() executes the removal handler submitted to acpi_attach_data() for that object. That handler is currently empty for struct acpi_device objects, so it is necessary to detach those objects from the corresponding ACPI namespace nodes in advance every time a table unload may happen. That is cumbersome and inefficient and leads to some design constraints that turn out to be quite inconvenient (in particular, struct acpi_device objects cannot be registered for namespace nodes representing devices that are not reported as present or functional by _STA). For this reason, introduce a non-empty removal handler for ACPI device objects that will unregister them when their ACPI namespace nodes go away. This code modification alone should not change functionality except for the ordering of the ACPI hotplug workqueue which should not matter (without subsequent code changes). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2013-11-07Merge branch 'acpi-hotplug'Rafael J. Wysocki
* acpi-hotplug: ACPI / hotplug: Consolidate deferred execution of ACPI hotplug routines ACPI / hotplug: Do not execute "insert in progress" _OST ACPI / hotplug: Carry out PCI root eject directly ACPI / hotplug: Merge device hot-removal routines ACPI / hotplug: Make acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() internal ACPI / hotplug: Simplify device ejection routines ACPI / hotplug: Fix handle_root_bridge_removal() ACPI / hotplug: Refuse to hot-remove all objects with disabled hotplug ACPI / scan: Start matching drivers after trying scan handlers ACPI: Remove acpi_pci_slot_init() headers from internal.h Conflicts: include/acpi/acpiosxf.h (with the 'acpica' branch)
2013-11-07ACPI / hotplug: Consolidate deferred execution of ACPI hotplug routinesRafael J. Wysocki
There are two different interfaces for queuing up work items on the ACPI hotplug workqueue, alloc_acpi_hp_work() used by PCI and PCI host bridge hotplug code and acpi_os_hotplug_execute() used by the common ACPI hotplug code and docking stations. They both are somewhat cumbersome to use and work slightly differently. The users of alloc_acpi_hp_work() have to submit a work function that will extract the necessary data items from a struct acpi_hp_work object allocated by alloc_acpi_hp_work() and then will free that object, while it would be more straightforward to simply use a work function with one more argument and let the interface take care of the execution details. The users of acpi_os_hotplug_execute() also have to deal with the fact that it takes only one argument in addition to the work function pointer, although acpi_os_execute_deferred() actually takes care of the allocation and freeing of memory, so it would have been able to pass more arguments to the work function if it hadn't been constrained by the connection with acpi_os_execute(). Moreover, while alloc_acpi_hp_work() makes GFP_KERNEL memory allocations, which is correct, because hotplug work items are always queued up from process context, acpi_os_hotplug_execute() uses GFP_ATOMIC, as that is needed by acpi_os_execute(). Also, acpi_os_execute_deferred() queued up by it waits for the ACPI event workqueues to flush before executing the work function, whereas alloc_acpi_hp_work() can't do anything similar. That leads to somewhat arbitrary differences in behavior between various ACPI hotplug code paths and has to be straightened up. For this reason, replace both alloc_acpi_hp_work() and acpi_os_hotplug_execute() with a single interface, acpi_hotplug_execute(), combining their behavior and being more friendly to its users than any of the two. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2013-11-07ACPI / hotplug: Carry out PCI root eject directlyRafael J. Wysocki
Since _handle_hotplug_event_root() is run from the ACPI hotplug workqueue, it doesn't need to queue up a work item to eject a PCI host bridge on the same workqueue. Instead, it can just carry out the eject by calling acpi_bus_device_eject() directly, so make that happen. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-11-07ACPI / hotplug: Make acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() internalRafael J. Wysocki
Notice that handle_root_bridge_removal() is the only user of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(), so it doesn't have to be exported any more and can be made internal to the ACPI core. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-11-07ACPI: Remove acpi_pci_slot_init() headers from internal.hRafael J. Wysocki
Since acpi_pci_slot_init() is now called from acpi_pci_init() and pci-acpi.h contains its header, remove that header (and the empty definition of that function for CONFIG_ACPI_PCI_SLOT unset) from internal.h as it doesn't have to be there any more. That also avoids a build warning about duplicate function definitions for CONFIG_ACPI_PCI_SLOT unset. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-10-16ACPI / video: Do not register backlight if win8 and native interface existsAaron Lu
According to Matthew Garrett, "Windows 8 leaves backlight control up to individual graphics drivers rather than making ACPI calls itself. There's plenty of evidence to suggest that the Intel driver for Windows [8] doesn't use the ACPI interface, including the fact that it's broken on a bunch of machines when the OS claims to support Windows 8. The simplest thing to do appears to be to disable the ACPI backlight interface on these systems". So for Win8 systems, if there is native backlight control interface registered by GPU driver, ACPI video does not need to register its own. Since there are systems that don't work well with this approach, a parameter for video module named use_native_backlight is introduced and has the value of false by default. For users who have a broken ACPI video backlight interface, video.use_native_backlight=1 is needed in kernel cmdline. Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-08-14Merge back earlier 'acpi-assorted' materialRafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-26Revert "ACPI / video / i915: No ACPI backlight if firmware expects Windows 8"Rafael J. Wysocki
We attempted to address a regression introduced by commit a57f7f9 (ACPICA: Add Windows8/Server2012 string for _OSI method.) after which ACPI video backlight support doesn't work on a number of systems, because the relevant AML methods in the ACPI tables in their BIOSes become useless after the BIOS has been told that the OS is compatible with Windows 8. That problem is tracked by the bug entry at: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51231 Commit 8c5bd7a (ACPI / video / i915: No ACPI backlight if firmware expects Windows 8) introduced for this purpose essentially prevented the ACPI backlight support from being used if the BIOS had been told that the OS was compatible with Windows 8 and the i915 driver was loaded, in which case the backlight would always be handled by i915. Unfortunately, however, that turned out to cause problems with backlight to appear on multiple systems with symptoms indicating that i915 was unable to control the backlight on those systems as expected. For this reason, revert commit 8c5bd7a, but leave the function acpi_video_backlight_quirks() introduced by it, because another commit on top of it uses that function. References: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/21/119 References: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/22/261 References: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/23/429 References: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/23/459 References: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/23/81 References: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/24/27 Reported-and-tested-by: James Hogan <james@albanarts.com> Reported-and-tested-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com> Reported-and-tested-by: Jörg Otte <jrg.otte@gmail.com> Reported-and-tested-by: Steven Newbury <steve@snewbury.org.uk> Reported-by: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de> Reported-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@adurom.com> Tested-by: Joerg Platte <jplatte@naasa.net> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-07-26ACPI: Cleanup sparse warning on acpi_os_initialize1()Lv Zheng
This patch cleans up the following sparse warning: # make C=2 drivers/acpi/osl.o ... drivers/acpi/osl.c:1775:20: warning: symbol 'acpi_os_initialize1' was not declared. Should it be static? ... CC drivers/acpi/osl.o Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-07-18ACPI / video / i915: No ACPI backlight if firmware expects Windows 8Rafael J. Wysocki
According to Matthew Garrett, "Windows 8 leaves backlight control up to individual graphics drivers rather than making ACPI calls itself. There's plenty of evidence to suggest that the Intel driver for Windows [8] doesn't use the ACPI interface, including the fact that it's broken on a bunch of machines when the OS claims to support Windows 8. The simplest thing to do appears to be to disable the ACPI backlight interface on these systems". There's a problem with that approach, however, because simply avoiding to register the ACPI backlight interface if the firmware calls _OSI for Windows 8 may not work in the following situations: (1) The ACPI backlight interface actually works on the given system and the i915 driver is not loaded (e.g. another graphics driver is used). (2) The ACPI backlight interface doesn't work on the given system, but there is a vendor platform driver that will register its own, equally broken, backlight interface if not prevented from doing so by the ACPI subsystem. Therefore we need to allow the ACPI backlight interface to be registered until the i915 driver is loaded which then will unregister it if the firmware has called _OSI for Windows 8 (or will register the ACPI video driver without backlight support if not already present). For this reason, introduce an alternative function for registering ACPI video, acpi_video_register_with_quirks(), that will check whether or not the ACPI video driver has already been registered and whether or not the backlight Windows 8 quirk has to be applied. If the quirk has to be applied, it will block the ACPI backlight support and either unregister the backlight interface if the ACPI video driver has already been registered, or register the ACPI video driver without the backlight interface otherwise. Make the i915 driver use acpi_video_register_with_quirks() instead of acpi_video_register() in i915_driver_load(). This change is based on earlier patches from Matthew Garrett, Chun-Yi Lee and Seth Forshee and includes a fix from Aaron Lu's. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51231 Tested-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Tested-by: Igor Gnatenko <i.gnatenko.brain@gmail.com> Tested-by: Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@debian.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Acked-by: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com>
2013-06-28Merge branch 'acpi-assorted'Rafael J. Wysocki
* acpi-assorted: ACPI / EC: Add HP Folio 13 to ec_dmi_table in order to skip DSDT scan ACPI: Add CMOS RTC Operation Region handler support ACPI: Remove unused flags in acpi_device_flags ACPI: Remove useless initializers ACPI / battery: Make sure all spaces are in correct places ACPI: add _STA evaluation at do_acpi_find_child() ACPI / EC: access user space with get_user()/put_user()
2013-06-28Merge branch 'acpi-hotplug'Rafael J. Wysocki
* acpi-hotplug: ACPI: Do not use CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_MEMORY_MODULE ACPI / cpufreq: Add ACPI processor device IDs to acpi-cpufreq Memory hotplug: Move alternative function definitions to header ACPI / processor: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference in acpi_processor_add() Memory hotplug / ACPI: Simplify memory removal ACPI / scan: Add second pass of companion offlining to hot-remove code Driver core / MM: Drop offline_memory_block() ACPI / processor: Pass processor object handle to acpi_bind_one() ACPI: Drop removal_type field from struct acpi_device Driver core / memory: Simplify __memory_block_change_state() ACPI / processor: Initialize per_cpu(processors, pr->id) properly CPU: Fix sysfs cpu/online of offlined CPUs Driver core: Introduce offline/online callbacks for memory blocks ACPI / memhotplug: Bind removable memory blocks to ACPI device nodes ACPI / processor: Use common hotplug infrastructure ACPI / hotplug: Use device offline/online for graceful hot-removal Driver core: Use generic offline/online for CPU offline/online Driver core: Add offline/online device operations
2013-06-27ACPI: Add CMOS RTC Operation Region handler supportLan Tianyu
On HP Folio 13-2000, the BIOS defines a CMOS RTC Operation Region and the EC's _REG methord accesses that region. Thus an appropriate address space handler must be registered for that region before the EC driver is loaded. Introduce a mechanism for adding CMOS RTC address space handlers. Register an ACPI scan handler for CMOS RTC devices such that, when a device of that kind is detected during an ACPI namespace scan, a common CMOS RTC operation region address space handler will be installed for it. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54621 Reported-and-tested-by: Stefan Nagy <public@stefan-nagy.at> Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> Cc: 3.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-06-23ACPI / dock: Initialize ACPI dock subsystem upfrontJiang Liu
Commit 3b63aaa70e1 (PCI: acpiphp: Do not use ACPI PCI subdriver mechanism) introduced an ACPI dock support regression, because it changed the relative initialization order of the ACPI dock subsystem and the ACPI-based PCI hotplug (acpiphp). Namely, the ACPI dock subsystem has to be initialized before acpiphp_enumerate_slots() is first run, which after commit 3b63aaa70e1 happens during the initial enumeration of the PCI hierarchy triggered by the initial ACPI namespace scan in acpi_scan_init(). For this reason, the dock subsystem has to be initialized before the initial ACPI namespace scan in acpi_scan_init(). To make that happen, modify the ACPI dock subsystem to be non-modular and add the invocation of its initialization routine, acpi_dock_init(), to acpi_scan_init() directly before the initial namespace scan. [rjw: Changelog, removal of dock_exit().] References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59501 Reported-and-tested-by: Alexander E. Patrakov <patrakov@gmail.com> Tested-by: Illya Klymov <xanf@xanf.me> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: 3.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-05-14dma: acpi-dma: parse CSRT to extract additional resourcesAndy Shevchenko
Since we have CSRT only to get additional DMA controller resources, let's get rid of drivers/acpi/csrt.c and move its logic inside ACPI DMA helpers code. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2013-05-12ACPI / processor: Use common hotplug infrastructureRafael J. Wysocki
Split the ACPI processor driver into two parts, one that is non-modular, resides in the ACPI core and handles the enumeration and hotplug of processors and one that implements the rest of the existing processor driver functionality. The non-modular part uses an ACPI scan handler object to enumerate processors on the basis of information provided by the ACPI namespace and to hook up with the common ACPI hotplug infrastructure. It also populates the ACPI handle of each processor device having a corresponding object in the ACPI namespace, which allows the driver proper to bind to those devices, and makes the driver bind to them if it is readily available (i.e. loaded) when the scan handler's .attach() routine is running. There are a few reasons to make this change. First, switching the ACPI processor driver to using the common ACPI hotplug infrastructure reduces code duplication and size considerably, even though a new file is created along with a header comment etc. Second, since the common hotplug code attempts to offline devices before starting the (non-reversible) removal procedure, it will abort (and possibly roll back) hot-remove operations involving processors if cpu_down() returns an error code for one of them instead of continuing them blindly (if /sys/firmware/acpi/hotplug/force_remove is unset). That is a more desirable behavior than what the current code does. Finally, the separation of the scan/hotplug part from the driver proper makes it possible to simplify the driver's .remove() routine, because it doesn't need to worry about the possible cleanup related to processor removal any more (the scan/hotplug part is responsible for that now) and can handle device removal and driver removal symmetricaly (i.e. as appropriate). Some user-visible changes in sysfs are made (for example, the 'sysdev' link from the ACPI device node to the processor device's directory is gone and a 'physical_node' link is present instead and a corresponding 'firmware_node' is present in the processor device's directory, the processor driver is now visible under /sys/bus/cpu/drivers/ and bound to the processor device), but that shouldn't affect the functionality that users care about (frequency scaling, C-states and thermal management). Tested on my venerable Toshiba Portege R500. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-05-12ACPI / hotplug: Use device offline/online for graceful hot-removalRafael J. Wysocki
Modify the generic ACPI hotplug code to be able to check if devices scheduled for hot-removal may be gracefully removed from the system using the device offline/online mechanism introduced previously. Namely, make acpi_scan_hot_remove() handling device hot-removal call device_offline() for all physical companions of the ACPI device nodes involved in the operation and check the results. If any of the device_offline() calls fails, the function will not progress to the removal phase (which cannot be aborted), unless its (new) force argument is set (in case of a failing offline it will put the devices offlined by it back online). In support of 'forced' device hot-removal, add a new sysfs attribute 'force_remove' that will reside under /sys/firmware/acpi/hotplug/. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-04-28Merge branch 'acpi-lpss'Rafael J. Wysocki
* acpi-lpss: ACPI / LPSS: make code less confusing for reader ACPI / LPSS: Add support for exposing LTR registers to user space ACPI / scan: Add special handler for Intel Lynxpoint LPSS devices
2013-03-24ACPI: Update PNPID set/free interfacesToshi Kani
This patch introduces acpi_set_pnp_ids() and acpi_free_pnp_ids(), which are updated from acpi_device_set_id() and acpi_free_ids(), to setup and free acpi_device_pnp for a given acpi_handle. They can be called without acpi_device. Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-03-21ACPI / scan: Add special handler for Intel Lynxpoint LPSS devicesRafael J. Wysocki
Devices on the Intel Lynxpoint Low Power Subsystem (LPSS) have some common features that aren't shared with any other platform devices, including the clock and LTR (Latency Tolerance Reporting) registers. It is better to handle those features in common code than to bother device drivers with doing that (I/O functionality-wise the LPSS devices are generally compatible with other devices that don't have those special registers and may be handled by the same drivers). The clock registers of the LPSS devices are now taken care of by the special clk-x86-lpss driver, but the MMIO mappings used for accessing those registers can also be used for accessing the LTR registers on those devices (LTR support for the Lynxpoint LPSS is going to be added by a subsequent patch). Thus it is convenient to add a special ACPI scan handler for the Lynxpoint LPSS devices that will create the MMIO mappings for accessing the clock (and LTR in the future) registers and will register the LPSS devices' clocks, so the clk-x86-lpss driver will only need to take care of the main Lynxpoint LPSS clock. Introduce a special ACPI scan handler for Intel Lynxpoint LPSS devices as described above. This also reduces overhead related to browsing the ACPI namespace in search of the LPSS devices before the registration of their clocks, removes some LPSS-specific (and somewhat ugly) code from acpi_platform.c and shrinks the overall code size slightly. Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
2013-03-04ACPI / scan: Make memory hotplug driver use struct acpi_scan_handlerRafael J. Wysocki
Make the ACPI memory hotplug driver use struct acpi_scan_handler for representing the object used to set up ACPI memory hotplug functionality and to remove hotplug memory ranges and data structures used by the driver before unregistering ACPI device nodes representing memory. Register the new struct acpi_scan_handler object with the help of acpi_scan_add_handler_with_hotplug() to allow user space to manipulate the attributes of the memory hotplug profile. This results in a significant reduction of the drvier's code size and removes some ACPI hotplug code duplication. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Tested-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-03-04ACPI / hotplug: Introduce user space interface for hotplug profilesRafael J. Wysocki
Introduce user space interface for manipulating hotplug profiles associated with ACPI scan handlers. The interface consists of sysfs directories under /sys/firmware/acpi/hotplug/, one for each hotplug profile, containing an attribute allowing user space to manipulate the enabled field of the corresponding profile. Namely, switching the enabled attribute from '0' to '1' will cause the common hotplug notify handler to be installed for all ACPI namespace objects representing devices matching the scan handler associated with the given hotplug profile (and analogously for the converse switch). Drivers willing to use the new user space interface should add their ACPI scan handlers with the help of new funtion acpi_scan_add_handler_with_hotplug(). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Tested-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-02-25Merge tag 'pm+acpi-fixes-3.9-rc1' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm Pull ACPI and power management fixes from Rafael Wysocki: - Fixes for blackfin and microblaze build problems introduced by the removal of global pm_idle. From Lars-Peter Clausen. - OPP core build fix from Shawn Guo. - Error condition check fix for the new imx6q-cpufreq driver from Wei Yongjun. - Fix for an AER driver crash related to the lack of APEI initialization for acpi=off. From Rafael J Wysocki. - Fix for a USB breakage on Thinkpad T430 related to ACPI power resources and PCI wakeup from Rafael J. Wysocki. * tag 'pm+acpi-fixes-3.9-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm: ACPI / PM: Take unusual configurations of power resources into account imx6q-cpufreq: fix return value check in imx6q_cpufreq_probe() PM / OPP: fix condition for empty of_init_opp_table() ACPI / APEI: Fix crash in apei_hest_parse() for acpi=off microblaze idle: Fix compile error blackfin idle: Fix compile error
2013-02-25Merge tag 'pci-v3.9-changes' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/helgaas/pci Pull PCI changes from Bjorn Helgaas: "Host bridge hotplug - Major overhaul of ACPI host bridge add/start (Rafael Wysocki, Yinghai Lu) - Major overhaul of PCI/ACPI binding (Rafael Wysocki, Yinghai Lu) - Split out ACPI host bridge and ACPI PCI device hotplug (Yinghai Lu) - Stop caching _PRT and make independent of bus numbers (Yinghai Lu) PCI device hotplug - Clean up cpqphp dead code (Sasha Levin) - Disable ARI unless device and upstream bridge support it (Yijing Wang) - Initialize all hot-added devices (not functions 0-7) (Yijing Wang) Power management - Don't touch ASPM if disabled (Joe Lawrence) - Fix ASPM link state management (Myron Stowe) Miscellaneous - Fix PCI_EXP_FLAGS accessor (Alex Williamson) - Disable Bus Master in pci_device_shutdown (Konstantin Khlebnikov) - Document hotplug resource and MPS parameters (Yijing Wang) - Add accessor for PCIe capabilities (Myron Stowe) - Drop pciehp suspend/resume messages (Paul Bolle) - Make pci_slot built-in only (not a module) (Jiang Liu) - Remove unused PCI/ACPI bind ops (Jiang Liu) - Removed used pci_root_bus (Bjorn Helgaas)" * tag 'pci-v3.9-changes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/helgaas/pci: (51 commits) PCI/ACPI: Don't cache _PRT, and don't associate them with bus numbers PCI: Fix PCI Express Capability accessors for PCI_EXP_FLAGS ACPI / PCI: Make pci_slot built-in only, not a module PCI/PM: Clear state_saved during suspend PCI: Use atomic_inc_return() rather than atomic_add_return() PCI: Catch attempts to disable already-disabled devices PCI: Disable Bus Master unconditionally in pci_device_shutdown() PCI: acpiphp: Remove dead code for PCI host bridge hotplug PCI: acpiphp: Create companion ACPI devices before creating PCI devices PCI: Remove unused "rc" in virtfn_add_bus() PCI: pciehp: Drop suspend/resume ENTRY messages PCI/ASPM: Don't touch ASPM if forcibly disabled PCI/ASPM: Deallocate upstream link state even if device is not PCIe PCI: Document MPS parameters pci=pcie_bus_safe, pci=pcie_bus_perf, etc PCI: Document hpiosize= and hpmemsize= resource reservation parameters PCI: Use PCI Express Capability accessor PCI: Introduce accessor to retrieve PCIe Capabilities Register PCI: Put pci_dev in device tree as early as possible PCI: Skip attaching driver in device_add() PCI: acpiphp: Keep driver loaded even if no slots found ...
2013-02-23Merge branch 'acpi-pm' into fixesRafael J. Wysocki
* acpi-pm: ACPI / PM: Take unusual configurations of power resources into account
2013-02-23ACPI / PM: Take unusual configurations of power resources into accountRafael J. Wysocki
Commit d2e5f0c (ACPI / PCI: Rework the setup and cleanup of device wakeup) moved the initial disabling of system wakeup for PCI devices into a place where it can actually work and that exposed a hidden old issue with crap^Wunusual system designs where the same power resources are used for both wakeup power and device power control at run time. Namely, say there is one power resource such that the ACPI power state D0 of a PCI device depends on that power resource (i.e. the device is in D0 when that power resource is "on") and it is used as a wakeup power resource for the same device. Then, calling acpi_pci_sleep_wake(pci_dev, false) for the device in question will cause the reference counter of that power resource to drop to 0, which in turn will cause it to be turned off. As a result, the device will go into D3cold at that point, although it should have stayed in D0. As it turns out, that happens to USB controllers on some laptops and USB becomes unusable on those machines as a result, which is a major regression from v3.8. To fix this problem, (1) increment the reference counters of wakup power resources during their initialization if they are "on" initially, (2) prevent acpi_disable_wakeup_device_power() from decrementing the reference counters of wakeup power resources that were not enabled for wakeup power previously, and (3) prevent acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power() from incrementing the reference counters of wakeup power resources that already are enabled for wakeup power. In addition to that, if it is impossible to determine the initial states of wakeup power resources, avoid enabling wakeup for devices whose wakeup power depends on those power resources. Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Reported-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Tested-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-02-15Merge branch 'pci/jiang-pci_slot-kconfig' into nextBjorn Helgaas
* pci/jiang-pci_slot-kconfig: ACPI / PCI: Make pci_slot built-in only, not a module