aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/mm
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@intel.com>2011-11-29 08:09:19 +0000
committerJeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>2011-12-05 00:12:22 -0800
commit5f4a780ddd453c4918555fed9d9c5f2d455a087d (patch)
treec538bffc542ce890e94321b6222f2166d1e3e94d /mm
parent09357b00255c233705b1cf6d76a8d147340545b8 (diff)
e1000e: hitting BUG_ON() from napi_enable
Based on a patch from Mike McElroy created against the out-of-tree e1000e driver: Hitting the BUG_ON in napi_enable(). Code inspection shows that this can only be triggered by calling napi_enable() twice without an intervening napi_disable(). I saw the following sequence of events in the stack trace: 1) We simulated a cable pull using an Extreme switch. 2) e1000_tx_timeout() was entered. 3) e1000_reset_task() was called. Saw the message from e_err() in the console log. 4) e1000_reinit_locked was called. This function calls e1000_down() and e1000_up(). These functions call napi_disable() and napi_enable() respectively. 5) Then on another thread, a monitor task saw carrier was down and executed 'ip set link down' and 'ip set link up' commands. 6) Saw the '_E1000_RESETTING'warning fron the e1000_close function. 7) Either the e1000_open() executed between the e1000_down() and e1000_up() calls in step 4 or the e1000_open() call executed after the e1000_up() call. In either case, napi_enable() is called twice which triggers the BUG_ON. Signed-off-by: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@intel.com> Cc: Mike McElroy <mike.mcelroy@stratus.com> Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions