aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNikolay Borisov <kernel@kyup.com>2015-10-16 09:40:28 +0300
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>2015-11-09 14:37:38 -0800
commite7bbf66da1b3be2626965afdcdac9bc44d26f485 (patch)
treef4269333a1be02a5db44746e8c548c53c39beb4d
parent30be9bc4ae69a894b38cbcbb5d1bdf99561b9e13 (diff)
netfilter: ipset: Fix sleeping memory allocation in atomic context
commit 00db674bedd68ff8b5afae9030ff5e04d45d1b4a upstream. Commit 00590fdd5be0 introduced RCU locking in list type and in doing so introduced a memory allocation in list_set_add, which is done in an atomic context, due to the fact that ipset rcu list modifications are serialised with a spin lock. The reason why we can't use a mutex is that in addition to modifying the list with ipset commands, it's also being modified when a particular ipset rule timeout expires aka garbage collection. This gc is triggered from set_cleanup_entries, which in turn is invoked from a timer thus requiring the lock to be bh-safe. Concretely the following call chain can lead to "sleeping function called in atomic context" splat: call_ad -> list_set_uadt -> list_set_uadd -> kzalloc(, GFP_KERNEL). And since GFP_KERNEL allows initiating direct reclaim thus potentially sleeping in the allocation path. To fix the issue change the allocation type to GFP_ATOMIC, to correctly reflect that it is occuring in an atomic context. Fixes: 00590fdd5be0 ("netfilter: ipset: Introduce RCU locking in list type") Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <kernel@kyup.com> Acked-by: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-rw-r--r--net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_list_set.c2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_list_set.c b/net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_list_set.c
index a1fe5377a2b3..5a30ce6e8c90 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_list_set.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_list_set.c
@@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ list_set_uadd(struct ip_set *set, void *value, const struct ip_set_ext *ext,
ip_set_timeout_expired(ext_timeout(n, set))))
n = NULL;
- e = kzalloc(set->dsize, GFP_KERNEL);
+ e = kzalloc(set->dsize, GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!e)
return -ENOMEM;
e->id = d->id;