aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>2014-03-06 19:01:07 -0500
committerBen Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>2014-04-30 16:23:23 +0100
commitd57813e995c66cb298e745f3ba7e4ceb7a47c248 (patch)
tree2f8ef31fce6786769b637987fee5d10c083b6867
parent135db4db00fec7f7680f3d104c887aad6b4e465f (diff)
Btrfs: fix deadlock with nested trans handles
commit 3bbb24b20a8800158c33eca8564f432dd14d0bf3 upstream. Zach found this deadlock that would happen like this btrfs_end_transaction <- reduce trans->use_count to 0 btrfs_run_delayed_refs btrfs_cow_block find_free_extent btrfs_start_transaction <- increase trans->use_count to 1 allocate chunk btrfs_end_transaction <- decrease trans->use_count to 0 btrfs_run_delayed_refs lock tree block we are cowing above ^^ We need to only decrease trans->use_count if it is above 1, otherwise leave it alone. This will make nested trans be the only ones who decrease their added ref, and will let us get rid of the trans->use_count++ hack if we have to commit the transaction. Thanks, Reported-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Tested-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> [bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust context] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
-rw-r--r--fs/btrfs/transaction.c14
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
index 81376d94cd3c..292e847f4193 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
@@ -460,7 +460,8 @@ static int __btrfs_end_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_fs_info *info = root->fs_info;
int count = 0;
- if (--trans->use_count) {
+ if (trans->use_count > 1) {
+ trans->use_count--;
trans->block_rsv = trans->orig_rsv;
return 0;
}
@@ -494,17 +495,10 @@ static int __btrfs_end_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
}
if (lock && cur_trans->blocked && !cur_trans->in_commit) {
- if (throttle) {
- /*
- * We may race with somebody else here so end up having
- * to call end_transaction on ourselves again, so inc
- * our use_count.
- */
- trans->use_count++;
+ if (throttle)
return btrfs_commit_transaction(trans, root);
- } else {
+ else
wake_up_process(info->transaction_kthread);
- }
}
WARN_ON(cur_trans != info->running_transaction);