aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>2013-07-23 20:01:23 +0200
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>2013-09-26 17:18:28 -0700
commit34db3c078aab40f22846b76c1a2c960c2a378f40 (patch)
treee40c164d7aa4dce84df6d3679af40d9b211658b1
parent4b5fe51a9a8e6d4c74a6f2717bf25e4132c551d3 (diff)
amd64_edac: Fix single-channel setups
commit f0a56c480196a98479760862468cc95879df3de0 upstream. It can happen that configurations are running in a single-channel mode even with a dual-channel memory controller, by, say, putting the DIMMs only on the one channel and leaving the other empty. This causes a problem in init_csrows which implicitly assumes that when the second channel is enabled, i.e. channel 1, the struct dimm hierarchy will be present. Which is not. So always allocate two channels unconditionally. This provides for the nice side effect that the data structures are initialized so some day, when memory hotplug is supported, it should just work out of the box when all of a sudden a second channel appears. Reported-and-tested-by: Roger Leigh <rleigh@debian.org> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-rw-r--r--drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c9
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
index 8b6a0343c220..8b3d90143514 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
@@ -2470,8 +2470,15 @@ static int amd64_init_one_instance(struct pci_dev *F2)
layers[0].size = pvt->csels[0].b_cnt;
layers[0].is_virt_csrow = true;
layers[1].type = EDAC_MC_LAYER_CHANNEL;
- layers[1].size = pvt->channel_count;
+
+ /*
+ * Always allocate two channels since we can have setups with DIMMs on
+ * only one channel. Also, this simplifies handling later for the price
+ * of a couple of KBs tops.
+ */
+ layers[1].size = 2;
layers[1].is_virt_csrow = false;
+
mci = edac_mc_alloc(nid, ARRAY_SIZE(layers), layers, 0);
if (!mci)
goto err_siblings;