diff options
| author | Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> | 2016-06-01 02:04:44 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> | 2016-07-10 23:07:35 -0400 |
| commit | d97246b5d16b77b57d835b6b4d1bde8ea6566b46 (patch) | |
| tree | 00c95e98e779afde0327f15607456c0912d5dd03 | |
| parent | a605e7476c66a13312189026e6977bad6ed3050d (diff) | |
netfilter: x_tables: don't reject valid target size on some architectures
[ Upstream commit 7b7eba0f3515fca3296b8881d583f7c1042f5226 ]
Quoting John Stultz:
In updating a 32bit arm device from 4.6 to Linus' current HEAD, I
noticed I was having some trouble with networking, and realized that
/proc/net/ip_tables_names was suddenly empty.
Digging through the registration process, it seems we're catching on the:
if (strcmp(t->u.user.name, XT_STANDARD_TARGET) == 0 &&
target_offset + sizeof(struct xt_standard_target) != next_offset)
return -EINVAL;
Where next_offset seems to be 4 bytes larger then the
offset + standard_target struct size.
next_offset needs to be aligned via XT_ALIGN (so we can access all members
of ip(6)t_entry struct).
This problem didn't show up on i686 as it only needs 4-byte alignment for
u64, but iptables userspace on other 32bit arches does insert extra padding.
Reported-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Tested-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Fixes: 7ed2abddd20cf ("netfilter: x_tables: check standard target size too")
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
| -rw-r--r-- | net/netfilter/x_tables.c | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/net/netfilter/x_tables.c b/net/netfilter/x_tables.c index 467ceadc1d18..5e5cc459dbcb 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/x_tables.c +++ b/net/netfilter/x_tables.c @@ -611,7 +611,7 @@ int xt_compat_check_entry_offsets(const void *base, const char *elems, return -EINVAL; if (strcmp(t->u.user.name, XT_STANDARD_TARGET) == 0 && - target_offset + sizeof(struct compat_xt_standard_target) != next_offset) + COMPAT_XT_ALIGN(target_offset + sizeof(struct compat_xt_standard_target)) != next_offset) return -EINVAL; /* compat_xt_entry match has less strict aligment requirements, @@ -693,7 +693,7 @@ int xt_check_entry_offsets(const void *base, return -EINVAL; if (strcmp(t->u.user.name, XT_STANDARD_TARGET) == 0 && - target_offset + sizeof(struct xt_standard_target) != next_offset) + XT_ALIGN(target_offset + sizeof(struct xt_standard_target)) != next_offset) return -EINVAL; return xt_check_entry_match(elems, base + target_offset, |