From 5e766e3e433fa2d5d2fdfd8e2432804c91393387 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Robert Richter Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 14:54:17 +0200 Subject: x86/oprofile: Fix usage of NUM_CONTROLS/NUM_COUNTERS macros Use the corresponding macros when iterating over counter and control registers. Since NUM_CONTROLS and NUM_COUNTERS are equal for AMD cpus the fix is more a cosmetical change. Signed-off-by: Robert Richter --- arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_amd.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/x86') diff --git a/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_amd.c b/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_amd.c index fdbed3a0c87..dcfd4505cac 100644 --- a/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_amd.c +++ b/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_amd.c @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ static void op_amd_fill_in_addresses(struct op_msrs * const msrs) #ifdef CONFIG_OPROFILE_EVENT_MULTIPLEX for (i = 0; i < NUM_VIRT_COUNTERS; i++) { - int hw_counter = i % NUM_CONTROLS; + int hw_counter = i % NUM_COUNTERS; if (reserve_perfctr_nmi(MSR_K7_PERFCTR0 + i)) msrs->multiplex[i].addr = MSR_K7_PERFCTR0 + hw_counter; else @@ -366,7 +366,7 @@ static void op_amd_shutdown(struct op_msrs const * const msrs) if (msrs->counters[i].addr) release_perfctr_nmi(MSR_K7_PERFCTR0 + i); } - for (i = 0; i < NUM_COUNTERS; ++i) { + for (i = 0; i < NUM_CONTROLS; ++i) { if (msrs->controls[i].addr) release_evntsel_nmi(MSR_K7_EVNTSEL0 + i); } -- cgit v1.2.3