From 209aba03243ee42a22f8df8d08aa9963f62aec64 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Woodhouse Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 10:21:07 +0100 Subject: AUDIT: Treat all user messages identically. It's silly to have to add explicit entries for new userspace messages as we invent them. Just treat all messages in the user range the same. Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse --- security/selinux/nlmsgtab.c | 17 +++++++---------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) (limited to 'security') diff --git a/security/selinux/nlmsgtab.c b/security/selinux/nlmsgtab.c index 67e77acc479..f0fb6d76f7c 100644 --- a/security/selinux/nlmsgtab.c +++ b/security/selinux/nlmsgtab.c @@ -98,14 +98,6 @@ static struct nlmsg_perm nlmsg_audit_perms[] = { AUDIT_DEL, NETLINK_AUDIT_SOCKET__NLMSG_WRITE }, { AUDIT_USER, NETLINK_AUDIT_SOCKET__NLMSG_RELAY }, { AUDIT_SIGNAL_INFO, NETLINK_AUDIT_SOCKET__NLMSG_READ }, - { AUDIT_USER_AUTH, NETLINK_AUDIT_SOCKET__NLMSG_RELAY }, - { AUDIT_USER_ACCT, NETLINK_AUDIT_SOCKET__NLMSG_RELAY }, - { AUDIT_USER_MGMT, NETLINK_AUDIT_SOCKET__NLMSG_RELAY }, - { AUDIT_CRED_ACQ, NETLINK_AUDIT_SOCKET__NLMSG_RELAY }, - { AUDIT_CRED_DISP, NETLINK_AUDIT_SOCKET__NLMSG_RELAY }, - { AUDIT_USER_START, NETLINK_AUDIT_SOCKET__NLMSG_RELAY }, - { AUDIT_USER_END, NETLINK_AUDIT_SOCKET__NLMSG_RELAY }, - { AUDIT_USER_AVC, NETLINK_AUDIT_SOCKET__NLMSG_RELAY }, }; @@ -150,8 +142,13 @@ int selinux_nlmsg_lookup(u16 sclass, u16 nlmsg_type, u32 *perm) break; case SECCLASS_NETLINK_AUDIT_SOCKET: - err = nlmsg_perm(nlmsg_type, perm, nlmsg_audit_perms, - sizeof(nlmsg_audit_perms)); + if (nlmsg_type >= AUDIT_FIRST_USER_MSG && + nlmsg_type <= AUDIT_LAST_USER_MSG) { + *perm = NETLINK_AUDIT_SOCKET__NLMSG_RELAY; + } else { + err = nlmsg_perm(nlmsg_type, perm, nlmsg_audit_perms, + sizeof(nlmsg_audit_perms)); + } break; /* No messaging from userspace, or class unknown/unhandled */ -- cgit v1.2.3