diff options
author | Paul A. Clarke <pc@us.ibm.com> | 2022-04-11 11:18:28 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Paul A. Clarke <pc@us.ibm.com> | 2022-04-25 09:49:24 -0500 |
commit | 235f88dbc3494c49e0f361a5a3f78491f72ff47c (patch) | |
tree | e067f815166eb5fd7bcfe732da920ee51b945110 | |
parent | 362e2a9c6297203bcf7f66bfb51dffb82b42d3b3 (diff) |
docs: Fix 'modff' reference in extend.texi
In commit a2a919aa501e3 (2003), built-ins for modf and modff were added.
In extend.texi, section "Other Builtins", "modf" was added to the paragraph
"There are also built-in versions of the ISO C99 functions [...]" and
"modf" was also added to the paragraph "The ISO C90 functions [...]".
"modff" was not added to either paragraph.
Based on the context clues about where "modfl" and other similar function
pairs like "powf/powl" appear, I believe the reference to "modf" in the
first paragraph (C99) should instead be "modff".
2022-04-25 Paul A. Clarke <pc@us.ibm.com>
gcc
* doc/extend.texi (Other Builtins): Correct reference to 'modff'.
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/doc/extend.texi | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/doc/extend.texi b/gcc/doc/extend.texi index 931e5ae3769..84e6f6694ab 100644 --- a/gcc/doc/extend.texi +++ b/gcc/doc/extend.texi @@ -13460,7 +13460,7 @@ There are also built-in versions of the ISO C99 functions @code{expl}, @code{fabsf}, @code{fabsl}, @code{floorf}, @code{floorl}, @code{fmodf}, @code{fmodl}, @code{frexpf}, @code{frexpl}, @code{ldexpf}, @code{ldexpl}, @code{log10f}, @code{log10l}, @code{logf}, @code{logl}, -@code{modfl}, @code{modf}, @code{powf}, @code{powl}, @code{sinf}, +@code{modfl}, @code{modff}, @code{powf}, @code{powl}, @code{sinf}, @code{sinhf}, @code{sinhl}, @code{sinl}, @code{sqrtf}, @code{sqrtl}, @code{tanf}, @code{tanhf}, @code{tanhl} and @code{tanl} that are recognized in any mode since ISO C90 reserves these names for |