From 733976125bb1aff4f3c0a802ecb614e1dbbd864a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Koen Kooi Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 16:38:11 +0200 Subject: binutils 2.23.2: import patch from OE-core to fix builds on recent distros. Change-Id: I83a75f72652311aaff84cd645c476a3be7219607 Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi --- .../recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.23.2.inc | 1 + .../replace_macros_with_static_inline.patch | 188 +++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 189 insertions(+) create mode 100644 meta-linaro-toolchain/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.23.2/replace_macros_with_static_inline.patch diff --git a/meta-linaro-toolchain/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.23.2.inc b/meta-linaro-toolchain/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.23.2.inc index d3d3ac3b..2ff4dc43 100644 --- a/meta-linaro-toolchain/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.23.2.inc +++ b/meta-linaro-toolchain/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.23.2.inc @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ SRC_URI = "\ file://binutils-fix-over-array-bounds-issue.patch \ file://binutils-xlp-support.patch \ file://tlsdesc_plt-aarch64_be.patch \ + file://replace_macros_with_static_inline.patch \ " BACKPORT = "\ diff --git a/meta-linaro-toolchain/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.23.2/replace_macros_with_static_inline.patch b/meta-linaro-toolchain/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.23.2/replace_macros_with_static_inline.patch new file mode 100644 index 00000000..834f55cf --- /dev/null +++ b/meta-linaro-toolchain/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.23.2/replace_macros_with_static_inline.patch @@ -0,0 +1,188 @@ +Upstream-Status: Backport + +From 27b829ee701e29804216b3803fbaeb629be27491 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Nick Clifton +Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:46:39 +0000 +Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Following up on Tom's suggestion I am checking in a patch to replace the various + bfd_xxx_set macros with static inline functions, so that we can avoid compile time + warnings about comma expressions with unused values. + + * bfd-in.h (bfd_set_section_vma): Delete. + (bfd_set_section_alignment): Delete. + (bfd_set_section_userdata): Delete. + (bfd_set_cacheable): Delete. + * bfd.c (bfd_set_cacheable): New static inline function. + * section.c (bfd_set_section_userdata): Likewise. + (bfd_set_section_vma): Likewise. + (bfd_set_section_alignment): Likewise. + * bfd-in2.h: Regenerate. +--- + bfd/ChangeLog | 12 ++++++++++++ + bfd/bfd-in.h | 5 ----- + bfd/bfd-in2.h | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ + bfd/bfd.c | 8 ++++++++ + bfd/section.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + 5 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/bfd/bfd-in.h b/bfd/bfd-in.h +index 3afd71b..c7c5a7d 100644 +--- a/bfd/bfd-in.h ++++ b/bfd/bfd-in.h +@@ -292,9 +292,6 @@ typedef struct bfd_section *sec_ptr; + + #define bfd_is_com_section(ptr) (((ptr)->flags & SEC_IS_COMMON) != 0) + +-#define bfd_set_section_vma(bfd, ptr, val) (((ptr)->vma = (ptr)->lma = (val)), ((ptr)->user_set_vma = TRUE), TRUE) +-#define bfd_set_section_alignment(bfd, ptr, val) (((ptr)->alignment_power = (val)),TRUE) +-#define bfd_set_section_userdata(bfd, ptr, val) (((ptr)->userdata = (val)),TRUE) + /* Find the address one past the end of SEC. */ + #define bfd_get_section_limit(bfd, sec) \ + (((bfd)->direction != write_direction && (sec)->rawsize != 0 \ +@@ -517,8 +514,6 @@ extern void warn_deprecated (const char *, const char *, int, const char *); + + #define bfd_get_symbol_leading_char(abfd) ((abfd)->xvec->symbol_leading_char) + +-#define bfd_set_cacheable(abfd,bool) (((abfd)->cacheable = bool), TRUE) +- + extern bfd_boolean bfd_cache_close + (bfd *abfd); + /* NB: This declaration should match the autogenerated one in libbfd.h. */ +diff --git a/bfd/bfd-in2.h b/bfd/bfd-in2.h +index 71996db..b5aeb40 100644 +--- a/bfd/bfd-in2.h ++++ b/bfd/bfd-in2.h +@@ -299,9 +299,6 @@ typedef struct bfd_section *sec_ptr; + + #define bfd_is_com_section(ptr) (((ptr)->flags & SEC_IS_COMMON) != 0) + +-#define bfd_set_section_vma(bfd, ptr, val) (((ptr)->vma = (ptr)->lma = (val)), ((ptr)->user_set_vma = TRUE), TRUE) +-#define bfd_set_section_alignment(bfd, ptr, val) (((ptr)->alignment_power = (val)),TRUE) +-#define bfd_set_section_userdata(bfd, ptr, val) (((ptr)->userdata = (val)),TRUE) + /* Find the address one past the end of SEC. */ + #define bfd_get_section_limit(bfd, sec) \ + (((bfd)->direction != write_direction && (sec)->rawsize != 0 \ +@@ -524,8 +521,6 @@ extern void warn_deprecated (const char *, const char *, int, const char *); + + #define bfd_get_symbol_leading_char(abfd) ((abfd)->xvec->symbol_leading_char) + +-#define bfd_set_cacheable(abfd,bool) (((abfd)->cacheable = bool), TRUE) +- + extern bfd_boolean bfd_cache_close + (bfd *abfd); + /* NB: This declaration should match the autogenerated one in libbfd.h. */ +@@ -1029,7 +1024,7 @@ bfd *bfd_openr (const char *filename, const char *target); + + bfd *bfd_fdopenr (const char *filename, const char *target, int fd); + +-bfd *bfd_openstreamr (const char *, const char *, void *); ++bfd *bfd_openstreamr (const char * filename, const char * target, void * stream); + + bfd *bfd_openr_iovec (const char *filename, const char *target, + void *(*open_func) (struct bfd *nbfd, +@@ -1596,6 +1591,32 @@ struct relax_table { + int size; + }; + ++/* Note: the following are provided as inline functions rather than macros ++ because not all callers use the return value. A macro implementation ++ would use a comma expression, eg: "((ptr)->foo = val, TRUE)" and some ++ compilers will complain about comma expressions that have no effect. */ ++static inline bfd_boolean ++bfd_set_section_userdata (bfd * abfd ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED, asection * ptr, void * val) ++{ ++ ptr->userdata = val; ++ return TRUE; ++} ++ ++static inline bfd_boolean ++bfd_set_section_vma (bfd * abfd ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED, asection * ptr, bfd_vma val) ++{ ++ ptr->vma = ptr->lma = val; ++ ptr->user_set_vma = TRUE; ++ return TRUE; ++} ++ ++static inline bfd_boolean ++bfd_set_section_alignment (bfd * abfd ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED, asection * ptr, unsigned int val) ++{ ++ ptr->alignment_power = val; ++ return TRUE; ++} ++ + /* These sections are global, and are managed by BFD. The application + and target back end are not permitted to change the values in + these sections. */ +@@ -6415,6 +6436,14 @@ struct bfd + unsigned int selective_search : 1; + }; + ++/* See note beside bfd_set_section_userdata. */ ++static inline bfd_boolean ++bfd_set_cacheable (bfd * abfd, bfd_boolean val) ++{ ++ abfd->cacheable = val; ++ return TRUE; ++} ++ + typedef enum bfd_error + { + bfd_error_no_error = 0, +diff --git a/bfd/bfd.c b/bfd/bfd.c +index 8d0580c..2d174f3 100644 +--- a/bfd/bfd.c ++++ b/bfd/bfd.c +@@ -311,6 +311,14 @@ CODE_FRAGMENT + . unsigned int selective_search : 1; + .}; + . ++.{* See note beside bfd_set_section_userdata. *} ++.static inline bfd_boolean ++.bfd_set_cacheable (bfd * abfd, bfd_boolean val) ++.{ ++. abfd->cacheable = val; ++. return TRUE; ++.} ++. + */ + + #include "sysdep.h" +diff --git a/bfd/section.c b/bfd/section.c +index fb19d8c..a661228 100644 +--- a/bfd/section.c ++++ b/bfd/section.c +@@ -542,6 +542,32 @@ CODE_FRAGMENT + . int size; + .}; + . ++.{* Note: the following are provided as inline functions rather than macros ++. because not all callers use the return value. A macro implementation ++. would use a comma expression, eg: "((ptr)->foo = val, TRUE)" and some ++. compilers will complain about comma expressions that have no effect. *} ++.static inline bfd_boolean ++.bfd_set_section_userdata (bfd * abfd ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED, asection * ptr, void * val) ++.{ ++. ptr->userdata = val; ++. return TRUE; ++.} ++. ++.static inline bfd_boolean ++.bfd_set_section_vma (bfd * abfd ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED, asection * ptr, bfd_vma val) ++.{ ++. ptr->vma = ptr->lma = val; ++. ptr->user_set_vma = TRUE; ++. return TRUE; ++.} ++. ++.static inline bfd_boolean ++.bfd_set_section_alignment (bfd * abfd ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED, asection * ptr, unsigned int val) ++.{ ++. ptr->alignment_power = val; ++. return TRUE; ++.} ++. + .{* These sections are global, and are managed by BFD. The application + . and target back end are not permitted to change the values in + . these sections. *} +-- +1.7.1 + -- cgit v1.2.3