From 32300751b4079cb5688453baa94711579d4285d5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 21:21:05 +0200 Subject: sched: 1Q08 RCU doc update, add call_rcu_sched() Long-delayed update to the RCU documentation, including adding the new call_rcu_sched() and rcu_barrier_sched() APIs. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner --- Documentation/RCU/NMI-RCU.txt | 3 ++ Documentation/RCU/RTFP.txt | 108 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------- Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt | 58 ++++++++++++++------- 4 files changed, 210 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-) (limited to 'Documentation') diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/NMI-RCU.txt b/Documentation/RCU/NMI-RCU.txt index c64158ecde4..a6d32e65d22 100644 --- a/Documentation/RCU/NMI-RCU.txt +++ b/Documentation/RCU/NMI-RCU.txt @@ -93,6 +93,9 @@ Since NMI handlers disable preemption, synchronize_sched() is guaranteed not to return until all ongoing NMI handlers exit. It is therefore safe to free up the handler's data as soon as synchronize_sched() returns. +Important note: for this to work, the architecture in question must +invoke irq_enter() and irq_exit() on NMI entry and exit, respectively. + Answer to Quick Quiz diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/RTFP.txt b/Documentation/RCU/RTFP.txt index 39ad8f56783..9f711d2df91 100644 --- a/Documentation/RCU/RTFP.txt +++ b/Documentation/RCU/RTFP.txt @@ -52,6 +52,10 @@ of each iteration. Unfortunately, chaotic relaxation requires highly structured data, such as the matrices used in scientific programs, and is thus inapplicable to most data structures in operating-system kernels. +In 1992, Henry (now Alexia) Massalin completed a dissertation advising +parallel programmers to defer processing when feasible to simplify +synchronization. RCU makes extremely heavy use of this advice. + In 1993, Jacobson [Jacobson93] verbally described what is perhaps the simplest deferred-free technique: simply waiting a fixed amount of time before freeing blocks awaiting deferred free. Jacobson did not describe @@ -138,6 +142,13 @@ blocking in read-side critical sections appeared [PaulEMcKenney2006c], Robert Olsson described an RCU-protected trie-hash combination [RobertOlsson2006a]. +2007 saw the journal version of the award-winning RCU paper from 2006 +[ThomasEHart2007a], as well as a paper demonstrating use of Promela +and Spin to mechanically verify an optimization to Oleg Nesterov's +QRCU [PaulEMcKenney2007QRCUspin], a design document describing +preemptible RCU [PaulEMcKenney2007PreemptibleRCU], and the three-part +LWN "What is RCU?" series [PaulEMcKenney2007WhatIsRCUFundamentally, +PaulEMcKenney2008WhatIsRCUUsage, and PaulEMcKenney2008WhatIsRCUAPI]. Bibtex Entries @@ -202,6 +213,20 @@ Bibtex Entries ,Year="1991" } +@phdthesis{HMassalinPhD +,author="H. Massalin" +,title="Synthesis: An Efficient Implementation of Fundamental Operating +System Services" +,school="Columbia University" +,address="New York, NY" +,year="1992" +,annotation=" + Mondo optimizing compiler. + Wait-free stuff. + Good advice: defer work to avoid synchronization. +" +} + @unpublished{Jacobson93 ,author="Van Jacobson" ,title="Avoid Read-Side Locking Via Delayed Free" @@ -635,3 +660,86 @@ Revised: " } +@unpublished{PaulEMcKenney2007PreemptibleRCU +,Author="Paul E. McKenney" +,Title="The design of preemptible read-copy-update" +,month="October" +,day="8" +,year="2007" +,note="Available: +\url{http://lwn.net/Articles/253651/} +[Viewed October 25, 2007]" +,annotation=" + LWN article describing the design of preemptible RCU. +" +} + +######################################################################## +# +# "What is RCU?" LWN series. +# + +@unpublished{PaulEMcKenney2007WhatIsRCUFundamentally +,Author="Paul E. McKenney and Jonathan Walpole" +,Title="What is {RCU}, Fundamentally?" +,month="December" +,day="17" +,year="2007" +,note="Available: +\url{http://lwn.net/Articles/262464/} +[Viewed December 27, 2007]" +,annotation=" + Lays out the three basic components of RCU: (1) publish-subscribe, + (2) wait for pre-existing readers to complete, and (2) maintain + multiple versions. +" +} + +@unpublished{PaulEMcKenney2008WhatIsRCUUsage +,Author="Paul E. McKenney" +,Title="What is {RCU}? Part 2: Usage" +,month="January" +,day="4" +,year="2008" +,note="Available: +\url{http://lwn.net/Articles/263130/} +[Viewed January 4, 2008]" +,annotation=" + Lays out six uses of RCU: + 1. RCU is a Reader-Writer Lock Replacement + 2. RCU is a Restricted Reference-Counting Mechanism + 3. RCU is a Bulk Reference-Counting Mechanism + 4. RCU is a Poor Man's Garbage Collector + 5. RCU is a Way of Providing Existence Guarantees + 6. RCU is a Way of Waiting for Things to Finish +" +} + +@unpublished{PaulEMcKenney2008WhatIsRCUAPI +,Author="Paul E. McKenney" +,Title="{RCU} part 3: the {RCU} {API}" +,month="January" +,day="17" +,year="2008" +,note="Available: +\url{http://lwn.net/Articles/264090/} +[Viewed January 10, 2008]" +,annotation=" + Gives an overview of the Linux-kernel RCU API and a brief annotated RCU + bibliography. +" +} + +@article{DinakarGuniguntala2008IBMSysJ +,author="D. Guniguntala and P. E. McKenney and J. Triplett and J. Walpole" +,title="The read-copy-update mechanism for supporting real-time applications on shared-memory multiprocessor systems with {Linux}" +,Year="2008" +,Month="April" +,journal="IBM Systems Journal" +,volume="47" +,number="2" +,pages="@@-@@" +,annotation=" + RCU, realtime RCU, sleepable RCU, performance. +" +} diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt index 42b01bc2e1b..cf5562cbe35 100644 --- a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt +++ b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt @@ -13,10 +13,13 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are always welcome! detailed performance measurements show that RCU is nonetheless the right tool for the job. - The other exception would be where performance is not an issue, - and RCU provides a simpler implementation. An example of this - situation is the dynamic NMI code in the Linux 2.6 kernel, - at least on architectures where NMIs are rare. + Another exception is where performance is not an issue, and RCU + provides a simpler implementation. An example of this situation + is the dynamic NMI code in the Linux 2.6 kernel, at least on + architectures where NMIs are rare. + + Yet another exception is where the low real-time latency of RCU's + read-side primitives is critically important. 1. Does the update code have proper mutual exclusion? @@ -39,9 +42,10 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are always welcome! 2. Do the RCU read-side critical sections make proper use of rcu_read_lock() and friends? These primitives are needed - to suppress preemption (or bottom halves, in the case of - rcu_read_lock_bh()) in the read-side critical sections, - and are also an excellent aid to readability. + to prevent grace periods from ending prematurely, which + could result in data being unceremoniously freed out from + under your read-side code, which can greatly increase the + actuarial risk of your kernel. As a rough rule of thumb, any dereference of an RCU-protected pointer must be covered by rcu_read_lock() or rcu_read_lock_bh() @@ -54,15 +58,30 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are always welcome! be running while updates are in progress. There are a number of ways to handle this concurrency, depending on the situation: - a. Make updates appear atomic to readers. For example, + a. Use the RCU variants of the list and hlist update + primitives to add, remove, and replace elements on an + RCU-protected list. Alternatively, use the RCU-protected + trees that have been added to the Linux kernel. + + This is almost always the best approach. + + b. Proceed as in (a) above, but also maintain per-element + locks (that are acquired by both readers and writers) + that guard per-element state. Of course, fields that + the readers refrain from accessing can be guarded by the + update-side lock. + + This works quite well, also. + + c. Make updates appear atomic to readers. For example, pointer updates to properly aligned fields will appear atomic, as will individual atomic primitives. Operations performed under a lock and sequences of multiple atomic primitives will -not- appear to be atomic. - This is almost always the best approach. + This can work, but is starting to get a bit tricky. - b. Carefully order the updates and the reads so that + d. Carefully order the updates and the reads so that readers see valid data at all phases of the update. This is often more difficult than it sounds, especially given modern CPUs' tendency to reorder memory references. @@ -123,18 +142,22 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are always welcome! when publicizing a pointer to a structure that can be traversed by an RCU read-side critical section. -5. If call_rcu(), or a related primitive such as call_rcu_bh(), - is used, the callback function must be written to be called - from softirq context. In particular, it cannot block. +5. If call_rcu(), or a related primitive such as call_rcu_bh() or + call_rcu_sched(), is used, the callback function must be + written to be called from softirq context. In particular, + it cannot block. 6. Since synchronize_rcu() can block, it cannot be called from - any sort of irq context. + any sort of irq context. Ditto for synchronize_sched() and + synchronize_srcu(). 7. If the updater uses call_rcu(), then the corresponding readers must use rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock(). If the updater uses call_rcu_bh(), then the corresponding readers must use - rcu_read_lock_bh() and rcu_read_unlock_bh(). Mixing things up - will result in confusion and broken kernels. + rcu_read_lock_bh() and rcu_read_unlock_bh(). If the updater + uses call_rcu_sched(), then the corresponding readers must + disable preemption. Mixing things up will result in confusion + and broken kernels. One exception to this rule: rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock() may be substituted for rcu_read_lock_bh() and rcu_read_unlock_bh() @@ -143,9 +166,9 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are always welcome! such cases is a must, of course! And the jury is still out on whether the increased speed is worth it. -8. Although synchronize_rcu() is a bit slower than is call_rcu(), - it usually results in simpler code. So, unless update - performance is critically important or the updaters cannot block, +8. Although synchronize_rcu() is slower than is call_rcu(), it + usually results in simpler code. So, unless update performance + is critically important or the updaters cannot block, synchronize_rcu() should be used in preference to call_rcu(). An especially important property of the synchronize_rcu() @@ -187,23 +210,23 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are always welcome! number of updates per grace period. 9. All RCU list-traversal primitives, which include - list_for_each_rcu(), list_for_each_entry_rcu(), + rcu_dereference(), list_for_each_rcu(), list_for_each_entry_rcu(), list_for_each_continue_rcu(), and list_for_each_safe_rcu(), - must be within an RCU read-side critical section. RCU + must be either within an RCU read-side critical section or + must be protected by appropriate update-side locks. RCU read-side critical sections are delimited by rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock(), or by similar primitives such as rcu_read_lock_bh() and rcu_read_unlock_bh(). - Use of the _rcu() list-traversal primitives outside of an - RCU read-side critical section causes no harm other than - a slight performance degradation on Alpha CPUs. It can - also be quite helpful in reducing code bloat when common - code is shared between readers and updaters. + The reason that it is permissible to use RCU list-traversal + primitives when the update-side lock is held is that doing so + can be quite helpful in reducing code bloat when common code is + shared between readers and updaters. 10. Conversely, if you are in an RCU read-side critical section, - you -must- use the "_rcu()" variants of the list macros. - Failing to do so will break Alpha and confuse people reading - your code. + and you don't hold the appropriate update-side lock, you -must- + use the "_rcu()" variants of the list macros. Failing to do so + will break Alpha and confuse people reading your code. 11. Note that synchronize_rcu() -only- guarantees to wait until all currently executing rcu_read_lock()-protected RCU read-side @@ -230,6 +253,14 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are always welcome! must use whatever locking or other synchronization is required to safely access and/or modify that data structure. + RCU callbacks are -usually- executed on the same CPU that executed + the corresponding call_rcu(), call_rcu_bh(), or call_rcu_sched(), + but are by -no- means guaranteed to be. For example, if a given + CPU goes offline while having an RCU callback pending, then that + RCU callback will execute on some surviving CPU. (If this was + not the case, a self-spawning RCU callback would prevent the + victim CPU from ever going offline.) + 14. SRCU (srcu_read_lock(), srcu_read_unlock(), and synchronize_srcu()) may only be invoked from process context. Unlike other forms of RCU, it -is- permissible to block in an SRCU read-side critical diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt b/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt index e0d6d99b8f9..e04d643a9f5 100644 --- a/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt +++ b/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +Please note that the "What is RCU?" LWN series is an excellent place +to start learning about RCU: + +1. What is RCU, Fundamentally? http://lwn.net/Articles/262464/ +2. What is RCU? Part 2: Usage http://lwn.net/Articles/263130/ +3. RCU part 3: the RCU API http://lwn.net/Articles/264090/ + + What is RCU? RCU is a synchronization mechanism that was added to the Linux kernel @@ -772,26 +780,18 @@ Linux-kernel source code, but it helps to have a full list of the APIs, since there does not appear to be a way to categorize them in docbook. Here is the list, by category. -Markers for RCU read-side critical sections: - - rcu_read_lock - rcu_read_unlock - rcu_read_lock_bh - rcu_read_unlock_bh - srcu_read_lock - srcu_read_unlock - RCU pointer/list traversal: rcu_dereference + list_for_each_entry_rcu + hlist_for_each_entry_rcu + list_for_each_rcu (to be deprecated in favor of list_for_each_entry_rcu) - list_for_each_entry_rcu list_for_each_continue_rcu (to be deprecated in favor of new list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu) - hlist_for_each_entry_rcu -RCU pointer update: +RCU pointer/list update: rcu_assign_pointer list_add_rcu @@ -799,16 +799,36 @@ RCU pointer update: list_del_rcu list_replace_rcu hlist_del_rcu + hlist_add_after_rcu + hlist_add_before_rcu hlist_add_head_rcu + hlist_replace_rcu + list_splice_init_rcu() -RCU grace period: +RCU: Critical sections Grace period Barrier + + rcu_read_lock synchronize_net rcu_barrier + rcu_read_unlock synchronize_rcu + call_rcu + + +bh: Critical sections Grace period Barrier + + rcu_read_lock_bh call_rcu_bh rcu_barrier_bh + rcu_read_unlock_bh + + +sched: Critical sections Grace period Barrier + + [preempt_disable] synchronize_sched rcu_barrier_sched + [and friends] call_rcu_sched + + +SRCU: Critical sections Grace period Barrier + + srcu_read_lock synchronize_srcu N/A + srcu_read_unlock - synchronize_net - synchronize_sched - synchronize_rcu - synchronize_srcu - call_rcu - call_rcu_bh See the comment headers in the source code (or the docbook generated from them) for more information. -- cgit v1.2.3 From d120f65f3aaf306c957bc4c82e510f5b0f1e9b27 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 05:21:44 -0700 Subject: rcu: make rcutorture more vicious: add stutter feature This patch takes a step towards making rcutorture more brutal by allowing the test to be automatically periodically paused, with the default being to run the test for five seconds then pause for five seconds and repeat. This behavior can be controlled using a new "stutter" module parameter, so that "stutter=0" gives the old default behavior of running continuously. Starting and stopping rcutorture more heavily stresses RCU's interaction with the scheduler, as well as exercising more paths through the grace-period detection code. Note that the default to "shuffle_interval" has also been adjusted from 5 seconds to 3 seconds to provide varying overlap with the "stutter" interval. I am still unable to provoke the failures that Alexey has been seeing, even with this patch, but will be doing a few additional things to beef up rcutorture. Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- Documentation/RCU/torture.txt | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'Documentation') diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/torture.txt b/Documentation/RCU/torture.txt index 2967a65269d..02b3d14c020 100644 --- a/Documentation/RCU/torture.txt +++ b/Documentation/RCU/torture.txt @@ -46,9 +46,15 @@ stat_interval The number of seconds between output of torture shuffle_interval The number of seconds to keep the test threads affinitied - to a particular subset of the CPUs, defaults to 5 seconds. + to a particular subset of the CPUs, defaults to 3 seconds. Used in conjunction with test_no_idle_hz. +stutter The length of time to run the test before pausing for this + same period of time. Defaults to "stutter=5", so as + to run and pause for (roughly) five-second intervals. + Specifying "stutter=0" causes the test to run continuously + without pausing, which is the old default behavior. + test_no_idle_hz Whether or not to test the ability of RCU to operate in a kernel that disables the scheduling-clock interrupt to idle CPUs. Boolean parameter, "1" to test, "0" otherwise. -- cgit v1.2.3 From 31a72bce0bd6f3e0114009288bccbc96376eeeca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:26:49 -0700 Subject: rcu: make rcutorture more vicious: reinstate boot-time testing This patch re-institutes the ability to build rcutorture directly into the Linux kernel. The reason that this capability was removed was that this could result in your kernel being pretty much useless, as rcutorture would be running starting from early boot. This problem has been avoided by (1) making rcutorture run only three seconds of every six by default, (2) adding a CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST_RUNNABLE that permits rcutorture to be quiesced at boot time, and (3) adding a sysctl in /proc named /proc/sys/kernel/rcutorture_runnable that permits rcutorture to be quiesced and unquiesced when built into the kernel. Please note that this /proc file is -not- available when rcutorture is built as a module. Please also note that to get the earlier take-no-prisoners behavior, you must use the boot command line to set rcutorture's "stutter" parameter to zero. The rcutorture quiescing mechanism is currently quite crude: loops in each rcutorture process that poll a global variable once per tick. Suggestions for improvement are welcome. The default action will be to reduce the polling rate to a few times per second. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- Documentation/RCU/torture.txt | 21 ++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) (limited to 'Documentation') diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/torture.txt b/Documentation/RCU/torture.txt index 02b3d14c020..516527d4bc5 100644 --- a/Documentation/RCU/torture.txt +++ b/Documentation/RCU/torture.txt @@ -10,13 +10,20 @@ status messages via printk(), which can be examined via the dmesg command (perhaps grepping for "torture"). The test is started when the module is loaded, and stops when the module is unloaded. -However, actually setting this config option to "y" results in the system -running the test immediately upon boot, and ending only when the system -is taken down. Normally, one will instead want to build the system -with CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST=m and to use modprobe and rmmod to control -the test, perhaps using a script similar to the one shown at the end of -this document. Note that you will need CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD in order -to be able to end the test. +CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST_RUNNABLE + +It is also possible to specify CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST=y, which will +result in the tests being loaded into the base kernel. In this case, +the CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST_RUNNABLE config option is used to specify +whether the RCU torture tests are to be started immediately during +boot or whether the /proc/sys/kernel/rcutorture_runnable file is used +to enable them. This /proc file can be used to repeatedly pause and +restart the tests, regardless of the initial state specified by the +CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST_RUNNABLE config option. + +You will normally -not- want to start the RCU torture tests during boot +(and thus the default is CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST_RUNNABLE=n), but doing +this can sometimes be useful in finding boot-time bugs. MODULE PARAMETERS -- cgit v1.2.3 From 0729fbf3bc70870370b4f43d652f05a468dc68b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:24:52 -0700 Subject: rcu: make rcutorture even more vicious: invoke RCU readers from irq handlers (timers) This patch allows torturing RCU from irq handlers (timers, in this case). A new module parameter irqreader enables such additional torturing, and is enabled by default. Variants of RCU that do not tolerate readers being called from irq handlers (e.g., SRCU) ignore irqreader. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney Cc: josh@freedesktop.org Cc: dvhltc@us.ibm.com Cc: niv@us.ibm.com Cc: dino@in.ibm.com Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org Cc: vegard.nossum@gmail.com Cc: adobriyan@gmail.com Cc: oleg@tv-sign.ru Cc: bunk@kernel.org Cc: rjw@sisk.pl Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- Documentation/RCU/torture.txt | 23 ++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) (limited to 'Documentation') diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/torture.txt b/Documentation/RCU/torture.txt index 516527d4bc5..a342b6e1cc1 100644 --- a/Documentation/RCU/torture.txt +++ b/Documentation/RCU/torture.txt @@ -30,10 +30,10 @@ MODULE PARAMETERS This module has the following parameters: -nreaders This is the number of RCU reading threads supported. - The default is twice the number of CPUs. Why twice? - To properly exercise RCU implementations with preemptible - read-side critical sections. +irqreaders Says to invoke RCU readers from irq level. This is currently + done via timers. Defaults to "1" for variants of RCU that + permit this. (Or, more accurately, variants of RCU that do + -not- permit this know to ignore this variable.) nfakewriters This is the number of RCU fake writer threads to run. Fake writer threads repeatedly use the synchronous "wait for @@ -44,6 +44,16 @@ nfakewriters This is the number of RCU fake writer threads to run. Fake to trigger special cases caused by multiple writers, such as the synchronize_srcu() early return optimization. +nreaders This is the number of RCU reading threads supported. + The default is twice the number of CPUs. Why twice? + To properly exercise RCU implementations with preemptible + read-side critical sections. + +shuffle_interval + The number of seconds to keep the test threads affinitied + to a particular subset of the CPUs, defaults to 3 seconds. + Used in conjunction with test_no_idle_hz. + stat_interval The number of seconds between output of torture statistics (via printk()). Regardless of the interval, statistics are printed when the module is unloaded. @@ -51,11 +61,6 @@ stat_interval The number of seconds between output of torture be printed -only- when the module is unloaded, and this is the default. -shuffle_interval - The number of seconds to keep the test threads affinitied - to a particular subset of the CPUs, defaults to 3 seconds. - Used in conjunction with test_no_idle_hz. - stutter The length of time to run the test before pausing for this same period of time. Defaults to "stutter=5", so as to run and pause for (roughly) five-second intervals. -- cgit v1.2.3