From 1fe06ad89255c211fe100d7f690d10b161398df8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jens Axboe Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:10:20 +0200 Subject: writeback: get rid of wbc->for_writepages It's only set, it's never checked. Kill it. Acked-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- mm/page-writeback.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'mm') diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c index dd73d29c15a..abc648f5de0 100644 --- a/mm/page-writeback.c +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c @@ -1020,12 +1020,10 @@ int do_writepages(struct address_space *mapping, struct writeback_control *wbc) if (wbc->nr_to_write <= 0) return 0; - wbc->for_writepages = 1; if (mapping->a_ops->writepages) ret = mapping->a_ops->writepages(mapping, wbc); else ret = generic_writepages(mapping, wbc); - wbc->for_writepages = 0; return ret; } -- cgit v1.2.3 From cfc4ba5365449cb6b5c9f68d755a142f17da1e47 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jens Axboe Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:12:40 +0200 Subject: writeback: use RCU to protect bdi_list Now that bdi_writeback_all() no longer handles integrity writeback, it doesn't have to block anymore. This means that we can switch bdi_list reader side protection to RCU. Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- mm/backing-dev.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- mm/page-writeback.c | 8 +++--- 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) (limited to 'mm') diff --git a/mm/backing-dev.c b/mm/backing-dev.c index d3ca0dac111..fd93566345b 100644 --- a/mm/backing-dev.c +++ b/mm/backing-dev.c @@ -26,6 +26,12 @@ struct backing_dev_info default_backing_dev_info = { EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(default_backing_dev_info); static struct class *bdi_class; + +/* + * bdi_lock protects updates to bdi_list and bdi_pending_list, as well as + * reader side protection for bdi_pending_list. bdi_list has RCU reader side + * locking. + */ DEFINE_SPINLOCK(bdi_lock); LIST_HEAD(bdi_list); LIST_HEAD(bdi_pending_list); @@ -284,9 +290,9 @@ static int bdi_start_fn(void *ptr) /* * Add us to the active bdi_list */ - spin_lock(&bdi_lock); - list_add(&bdi->bdi_list, &bdi_list); - spin_unlock(&bdi_lock); + spin_lock_bh(&bdi_lock); + list_add_rcu(&bdi->bdi_list, &bdi_list); + spin_unlock_bh(&bdi_lock); bdi_task_init(bdi, wb); @@ -389,7 +395,7 @@ static int bdi_forker_task(void *ptr) if (wb_has_dirty_io(me) || !list_empty(&me->bdi->work_list)) wb_do_writeback(me, 0); - spin_lock(&bdi_lock); + spin_lock_bh(&bdi_lock); /* * Check if any existing bdi's have dirty data without @@ -410,7 +416,7 @@ static int bdi_forker_task(void *ptr) if (list_empty(&bdi_pending_list)) { unsigned long wait; - spin_unlock(&bdi_lock); + spin_unlock_bh(&bdi_lock); wait = msecs_to_jiffies(dirty_writeback_interval * 10); schedule_timeout(wait); try_to_freeze(); @@ -426,7 +432,7 @@ static int bdi_forker_task(void *ptr) bdi = list_entry(bdi_pending_list.next, struct backing_dev_info, bdi_list); list_del_init(&bdi->bdi_list); - spin_unlock(&bdi_lock); + spin_unlock_bh(&bdi_lock); wb = &bdi->wb; wb->task = kthread_run(bdi_start_fn, wb, "flush-%s", @@ -445,9 +451,9 @@ static int bdi_forker_task(void *ptr) * a chance to flush other bdi's to free * memory. */ - spin_lock(&bdi_lock); + spin_lock_bh(&bdi_lock); list_add_tail(&bdi->bdi_list, &bdi_pending_list); - spin_unlock(&bdi_lock); + spin_unlock_bh(&bdi_lock); bdi_flush_io(bdi); } @@ -456,6 +462,24 @@ static int bdi_forker_task(void *ptr) return 0; } +static void bdi_add_to_pending(struct rcu_head *head) +{ + struct backing_dev_info *bdi; + + bdi = container_of(head, struct backing_dev_info, rcu_head); + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bdi->bdi_list); + + spin_lock(&bdi_lock); + list_add_tail(&bdi->bdi_list, &bdi_pending_list); + spin_unlock(&bdi_lock); + + /* + * We are now on the pending list, wake up bdi_forker_task() + * to finish the job and add us back to the active bdi_list + */ + wake_up_process(default_backing_dev_info.wb.task); +} + /* * Add the default flusher task that gets created for any bdi * that has dirty data pending writeout @@ -478,16 +502,29 @@ void static bdi_add_default_flusher_task(struct backing_dev_info *bdi) * waiting for previous additions to finish. */ if (!test_and_set_bit(BDI_pending, &bdi->state)) { - list_move_tail(&bdi->bdi_list, &bdi_pending_list); + list_del_rcu(&bdi->bdi_list); /* - * We are now on the pending list, wake up bdi_forker_task() - * to finish the job and add us back to the active bdi_list + * We must wait for the current RCU period to end before + * moving to the pending list. So schedule that operation + * from an RCU callback. */ - wake_up_process(default_backing_dev_info.wb.task); + call_rcu(&bdi->rcu_head, bdi_add_to_pending); } } +/* + * Remove bdi from bdi_list, and ensure that it is no longer visible + */ +static void bdi_remove_from_list(struct backing_dev_info *bdi) +{ + spin_lock_bh(&bdi_lock); + list_del_rcu(&bdi->bdi_list); + spin_unlock_bh(&bdi_lock); + + synchronize_rcu(); +} + int bdi_register(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, struct device *parent, const char *fmt, ...) { @@ -506,9 +543,9 @@ int bdi_register(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, struct device *parent, goto exit; } - spin_lock(&bdi_lock); - list_add_tail(&bdi->bdi_list, &bdi_list); - spin_unlock(&bdi_lock); + spin_lock_bh(&bdi_lock); + list_add_tail_rcu(&bdi->bdi_list, &bdi_list); + spin_unlock_bh(&bdi_lock); bdi->dev = dev; @@ -526,9 +563,7 @@ int bdi_register(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, struct device *parent, wb->task = NULL; ret = -ENOMEM; - spin_lock(&bdi_lock); - list_del(&bdi->bdi_list); - spin_unlock(&bdi_lock); + bdi_remove_from_list(bdi); goto exit; } } @@ -565,9 +600,7 @@ static void bdi_wb_shutdown(struct backing_dev_info *bdi) /* * Make sure nobody finds us on the bdi_list anymore */ - spin_lock(&bdi_lock); - list_del(&bdi->bdi_list); - spin_unlock(&bdi_lock); + bdi_remove_from_list(bdi); /* * Finally, kill the kernel threads. We don't need to be RCU @@ -599,6 +632,7 @@ int bdi_init(struct backing_dev_info *bdi) bdi->max_ratio = 100; bdi->max_prop_frac = PROP_FRAC_BASE; spin_lock_init(&bdi->wb_lock); + INIT_RCU_HEAD(&bdi->rcu_head); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bdi->bdi_list); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bdi->wb_list); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bdi->work_list); diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c index abc648f5de0..12c3d843ce9 100644 --- a/mm/page-writeback.c +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ int bdi_set_min_ratio(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, unsigned int min_ratio) { int ret = 0; - spin_lock(&bdi_lock); + spin_lock_bh(&bdi_lock); if (min_ratio > bdi->max_ratio) { ret = -EINVAL; } else { @@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ int bdi_set_min_ratio(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, unsigned int min_ratio) ret = -EINVAL; } } - spin_unlock(&bdi_lock); + spin_unlock_bh(&bdi_lock); return ret; } @@ -339,14 +339,14 @@ int bdi_set_max_ratio(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, unsigned max_ratio) if (max_ratio > 100) return -EINVAL; - spin_lock(&bdi_lock); + spin_lock_bh(&bdi_lock); if (bdi->min_ratio > max_ratio) { ret = -EINVAL; } else { bdi->max_ratio = max_ratio; bdi->max_prop_frac = (PROP_FRAC_BASE * max_ratio) / 100; } - spin_unlock(&bdi_lock); + spin_unlock_bh(&bdi_lock); return ret; } -- cgit v1.2.3 From b6e51316daede0633e9274e1e30391cfa4747877 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jens Axboe Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:13:54 +0200 Subject: writeback: separate starting of sync vs opportunistic writeback bdi_start_writeback() is currently split into two paths, one for WB_SYNC_NONE and one for WB_SYNC_ALL. Add bdi_sync_writeback() for WB_SYNC_ALL writeback and let bdi_start_writeback() handle only WB_SYNC_NONE. Push down the writeback_control allocation and only accept the parameters that make sense for each function. This cleans up the API considerably. Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- mm/page-writeback.c | 12 ++---------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) (limited to 'mm') diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c index 12c3d843ce9..1eea4fa0d41 100644 --- a/mm/page-writeback.c +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c @@ -582,16 +582,8 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping) if ((laptop_mode && pages_written) || (!laptop_mode && ((nr_writeback = global_page_state(NR_FILE_DIRTY) + global_page_state(NR_UNSTABLE_NFS)) - > background_thresh))) { - struct writeback_control wbc = { - .bdi = bdi, - .sync_mode = WB_SYNC_NONE, - .nr_to_write = nr_writeback, - }; - - - bdi_start_writeback(&wbc); - } + > background_thresh))) + bdi_start_writeback(bdi, nr_writeback); } void set_page_dirty_balance(struct page *page, int page_mkwrite) -- cgit v1.2.3 From ce5f8e7795195edb6f84f74aa9d72e739df38486 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jens Axboe Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:57:56 +0200 Subject: writeback: splice dirty inode entries to default bdi on bdi_destroy() We cannot safely ensure that the inodes are all gone at this point in time, and we must not destroy this bdi with inodes having off it. So just splice our entries to the default bdi since that one will always persist. Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- mm/backing-dev.c | 14 +++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'mm') diff --git a/mm/backing-dev.c b/mm/backing-dev.c index fd93566345b..3d3accb1f80 100644 --- a/mm/backing-dev.c +++ b/mm/backing-dev.c @@ -668,7 +668,19 @@ void bdi_destroy(struct backing_dev_info *bdi) { int i; - WARN_ON(bdi_has_dirty_io(bdi)); + /* + * Splice our entries to the default_backing_dev_info, if this + * bdi disappears + */ + if (bdi_has_dirty_io(bdi)) { + struct bdi_writeback *dst = &default_backing_dev_info.wb; + + spin_lock(&inode_lock); + list_splice(&bdi->wb.b_dirty, &dst->b_dirty); + list_splice(&bdi->wb.b_io, &dst->b_io); + list_splice(&bdi->wb.b_more_io, &dst->b_more_io); + spin_unlock(&inode_lock); + } bdi_unregister(bdi); -- cgit v1.2.3