From 815bc5f8fe516f55291aef90f2142073821e7a9c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Artem Bityutskiy Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 19:28:18 +0300 Subject: UBI: fix multiple spelling typos Some of the typos were indicated by Adrian Hunter, some by 'aspell'. Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy --- drivers/mtd/ubi/eba.c | 2 +- drivers/mtd/ubi/io.c | 2 +- drivers/mtd/ubi/ubi.h | 4 ++-- drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c | 14 +++++++------- 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/mtd') diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/eba.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/eba.c index 632b95f3ff3..b6565561218 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/eba.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/eba.c @@ -951,7 +951,7 @@ write_error: * physical eraseblock @to. The @vid_hdr buffer may be changed by this * function. Returns: * o %0 in case of success; - * o %MOVE_CANCEL_RACE, %MOVE_TARGET_WR_ERR, or %MOVE_CANCEL_BITFLIPS; + * o %MOVE_CANCEL_RACE, %MOVE_TARGET_WR_ERR, %MOVE_CANCEL_BITFLIPS, etc; * o a negative error code in case of failure. */ int ubi_eba_copy_leb(struct ubi_device *ubi, int from, int to, diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/io.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/io.c index ac6604aeb72..effaff28bab 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/io.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/io.c @@ -899,7 +899,7 @@ bad: * o %UBI_IO_BITFLIPS if the CRC is correct, but bit-flips were detected * and corrected by the flash driver; this is harmless but may indicate that * this eraseblock may become bad soon; - * o %UBI_IO_BAD_VID_HRD if the volume identifier header is corrupted (a CRC + * o %UBI_IO_BAD_VID_HDR if the volume identifier header is corrupted (a CRC * error detected); * o %UBI_IO_PEB_FREE if the physical eraseblock is free (i.e., there is no VID * header there); diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/ubi.h b/drivers/mtd/ubi/ubi.h index 82da62bde41..70ce48b95b6 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/ubi.h +++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/ubi.h @@ -333,8 +333,8 @@ struct ubi_wl_entry; * protected from the wear-leveling worker) * @pq_head: protection queue head * @wl_lock: protects the @used, @free, @pq, @pq_head, @lookuptbl, @move_from, - * @move_to, @move_to_put @erase_pending, @wl_scheduled, @works and - * @erroneous_peb_count fields + * @move_to, @move_to_put @erase_pending, @wl_scheduled, @works, + * @erroneous, and @erroneous_peb_count fields * @move_mutex: serializes eraseblock moves * @work_sem: synchronizes the WL worker with use tasks * @wl_scheduled: non-zero if the wear-leveling was scheduled diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c index acb5520f7f3..2b247230061 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ * used. The former state corresponds to the @wl->free tree. The latter state * is split up on several sub-states: * o the WL movement is allowed (@wl->used tree); - * o the WL movement is disallowed (@wl->erroneous) becouse the PEB is + * o the WL movement is disallowed (@wl->erroneous) because the PEB is * erroneous - e.g., there was a read error; * o the WL movement is temporarily prohibited (@wl->pq queue); * o scrubbing is needed (@wl->scrub tree). @@ -744,8 +744,8 @@ static int wear_leveling_worker(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct ubi_work *wrk, * given, so we have a situation when it has not yet * had a chance to write it, because it was preempted. * So add this PEB to the protection queue so far, - * because presubably more data will be written there - * (including the missin VID header), and then we'll + * because presumably more data will be written there + * (including the missing VID header), and then we'll * move it. */ dbg_wl("PEB %d has no VID header", e1->pnum); @@ -790,8 +790,8 @@ static int wear_leveling_worker(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct ubi_work *wrk, * not switch to R/O mode in this case, and give the * upper layers a possibility to recover from this, * e.g. by unmapping corresponding LEB. Instead, just - * put thie PEB to the @ubi->erroneus list to prevent - * UBI from trying to move the over and over again. + * put this PEB to the @ubi->erroneous list to prevent + * UBI from trying to move it over and over again. */ if (ubi->erroneous_peb_count > ubi->max_erroneous) { ubi_err("too many erroneous eraseblocks (%d)", @@ -1045,7 +1045,7 @@ static int erase_worker(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct ubi_work *wl_wrk, /* * If this is not %-EIO, we have no idea what to do. Scheduling * this physical eraseblock for erasure again would cause - * errors again and again. Well, lets switch to RO mode. + * errors again and again. Well, lets switch to R/O mode. */ goto out_ro; } @@ -1161,7 +1161,7 @@ retry: rb_erase(&e->u.rb, &ubi->erroneous); ubi->erroneous_peb_count -= 1; ubi_assert(ubi->erroneous_peb_count >= 0); - /* Erronious PEBs should be tortured */ + /* Erroneous PEBs should be tortured */ torture = 1; } else { err = prot_queue_del(ubi, e->pnum); -- cgit v1.2.3