aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/sched/rt.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2012-09-13sched: Remove __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSWPeter Zijlstra
Now that the last architecture to use this has stopped doing so (ARM, thanks Catalin!) we can remove this complexity from the scheduler core. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-g9p2a1w81xxbrze25v9zpzbf@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2012-09-04sched: Unthrottle rt runqueues in __disable_runtime()Peter Boonstoppel
migrate_tasks() uses _pick_next_task_rt() to get tasks from the real-time runqueues to be migrated. When rt_rq is throttled _pick_next_task_rt() won't return anything, in which case migrate_tasks() can't move all threads over and gets stuck in an infinite loop. Instead unthrottle rt runqueues before migrating tasks. Additionally: move unthrottle_offline_cfs_rqs() to rq_offline_fair() Signed-off-by: Peter Boonstoppel <pboonstoppel@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5FBF8E85CA34454794F0F7ECBA79798F379D3648B7@HQMAIL04.nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2012-08-13sched,rt: fix isolated CPUs leaving root_task_group indefinitely throttledMike Galbraith
Root task group bandwidth replenishment must service all CPUs, regardless of where the timer was last started, and regardless of the isolation mechanism, lest 'Quoth the Raven, "Nevermore"' become rt scheduling policy. Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1344326558.6968.25.camel@marge.simpson.net Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2012-06-06sched/rt: Fix lockdep annotation within find_lock_lowest_rq()Peter Zijlstra
Roland Dreier reported spurious, hard to trigger lockdep warnings within the scheduler - without any real lockup. This bit gives us the right clue: > [89945.640512] [<ffffffff8103fa1a>] double_lock_balance+0x5a/0x90 > [89945.640568] [<ffffffff8104c546>] push_rt_task+0xc6/0x290 if you look at that code you'll find the double_lock_balance() in question is the one in find_lock_lowest_rq() [yay for inlining]. Now find_lock_lowest_rq() has a bug.. it fails to use double_unlock_balance() in one exit path, if this results in a retry in push_rt_task() we'll call double_lock_balance() again, at which point we'll run into said lockdep confusion. Reported-by: Roland Dreier <roland@kernel.org> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1337282386.4281.77.camel@twins Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2012-05-30sched/rt: Fix SCHED_RR across cgroupsColin Cross
task_tick_rt() has an optimization to only reschedule SCHED_RR tasks if they were the only element on their rq. However, with cgroups a SCHED_RR task could be the only element on its per-cgroup rq but still be competing with other SCHED_RR tasks in its parent's cgroup. In this case, the SCHED_RR task in the child cgroup would never yield at the end of its timeslice. If the child cgroup rt_runtime_us was the same as the parent cgroup rt_runtime_us, the task in the parent cgroup would starve completely. Modify task_tick_rt() to check that the task is the only task on its rq, and that the each of the scheduling entities of its ancestors is also the only entity on its rq. Signed-off-by: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1337229266-15798-1-git-send-email-ccross@android.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2012-05-30sched: Move nr_cpus_allowed out of 'struct sched_rt_entity'Peter Zijlstra
Since nr_cpus_allowed is used outside of sched/rt.c and wants to be used outside of there more, move it to a more natural site. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-kr61f02y9brwzkh6x53pdptm@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2012-04-14Merge branch 'tip/sched/core' of ↵Ingo Molnar
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-trace into sched/core Pull a scheduler optimization commit from Steven Rostedt. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2012-04-12sched_rt: Avoid unnecessary dequeue and enqueue of pushable tasks in ↵Kirill Tkhai
set_cpus_allowed_rt() Migration status depends on a difference of weight from 0 and 1. If weight > 1 (<= 1) and old weight <= 1 (> 1) then task becomes pushable (or not pushable). We are not insterested in its exact values, is it 3 or 4, for example. Now if we are changing affinity from a set of 3 cpus to a set of 4, the- task will be dequeued and enqueued sequentially without important difference in comparison with initial state. The only difference is in internal representation of plist queue of pushable tasks and the fact that the task may won't be the first in a sequence of the same priority tasks. But it seems to me it gives nothing. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/273741334120764@web83.yandex.ru Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Tkhai Kirill <tkhai@yandex.ru> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2012-03-27sched/rt: Improve pick_next_highest_task_rt()Michael J Wang
Avoid extra work by continuing on to the next rt_rq if the highest prio task in current rt_rq is the same priority as our candidate task. More detailed explanation: if next is not NULL, then we have found a candidate task, and its priority is next->prio. Now we are looking for an even higher priority task in the other rt_rq's. idx is the highest priority in the current candidate rt_rq. In the current 3.3 code, if idx is equal to next->prio, we would start scanning the tasks in that rt_rq and replace the current candidate task with a task from that rt_rq. But the new task would only have a priority that is equal to our previous candidate task, so we have not advanced our goal of finding a higher prio task. So we should avoid the extra work by continuing on to the next rt_rq if idx is equal to next->prio. Signed-off-by: Michael J Wang <mjwang@broadcom.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Reviewed-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/2EF88150C0EF2C43A218742ED384C1BC0FC83D6B@IRVEXCHMB08.corp.ad.broadcom.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2012-03-12printk/sched: Introduce special printk_sched() for those awkward momentsPeter Zijlstra
There's a few awkward printk()s inside of scheduler guts that people prefer to keep but really are rather deadlock prone. Fudge around it by storing the text in a per-cpu buffer and poll it using the existing printk_tick() handler. This will drop output when its more frequent than once a tick, however only the affinity thing could possible go that fast and for that just one should suffice to notify the admin he's done something silly.. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-wua3lmkt3dg8nfts66o6brne@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2012-03-01sched/rt: Do not throttle when PI boostingPeter Zijlstra
When a runqueue has rt_runtime_us = 0 then the only way it can accumulate rt_time is via PI boosting. That causes the runqueue to be throttled and replenishing does not change anything due to rt_runtime_us = 0. So avoid that situation by clearing rt_time and skip the throttling alltogether. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> [ Changelog ] Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-7x70cypsotjb4jvcor3edctk@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2012-03-01sched/rt: Keep period timer ticking when rt throttling is activePeter Zijlstra
When a runqueue is throttled we cannot disable the period timer because that timer is the only way to undo the throttling. We got stale throttling entries when a rq was throttled and then the global sysctl was disabled, which stopped the timer. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> [ Added changelog ] Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-nuj34q52p6ro7szapuz84i0v@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2012-02-22sched: Make initial SCHED_RR timeslace DEF_TIMESLICEHiroshi Shimamoto
Current the initial SCHED_RR timeslice of init_task is HZ, which means 1s, and is not same as the default SCHED_RR timeslice DEF_TIMESLICE. Change that initial timeslice to the DEF_TIMESLICE. Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com> [ s/DEF_TIMESLICE/RR_TIMESLICE/g ] Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/4F3C9995.3010800@ct.jp.nec.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2012-01-27sched/rt: Fix task stack corruption under __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSWChanho Min
This issue happens under the following conditions: 1. preemption is off 2. __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW is defined 3. RT scheduling class 4. SMP system Sequence is as follows: 1.suppose current task is A. start schedule() 2.task A is enqueued pushable task at the entry of schedule() __schedule prev = rq->curr; ... put_prev_task put_prev_task_rt enqueue_pushable_task 4.pick the task B as next task. next = pick_next_task(rq); 3.rq->curr set to task B and context_switch is started. rq->curr = next; 4.At the entry of context_swtich, release this cpu's rq->lock. context_switch prepare_task_switch prepare_lock_switch raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rq->lock); 5.Shortly after rq->lock is released, interrupt is occurred and start IRQ context 6.try_to_wake_up() which called by ISR acquires rq->lock try_to_wake_up ttwu_remote rq = __task_rq_lock(p) ttwu_do_wakeup(rq, p, wake_flags); task_woken_rt 7.push_rt_task picks the task A which is enqueued before. task_woken_rt push_rt_tasks(rq) next_task = pick_next_pushable_task(rq) 8.At find_lock_lowest_rq(), If double_lock_balance() returns 0, lowest_rq can be the remote rq. (But,If preemption is on, double_lock_balance always return 1 and it does't happen.) push_rt_task find_lock_lowest_rq if (double_lock_balance(rq, lowest_rq)).. 9.find_lock_lowest_rq return the available rq. task A is migrated to the remote cpu/rq. push_rt_task ... deactivate_task(rq, next_task, 0); set_task_cpu(next_task, lowest_rq->cpu); activate_task(lowest_rq, next_task, 0); 10. But, task A is on irq context at this cpu. So, task A is scheduled by two cpus at the same time until restore from IRQ. Task A's stack is corrupted. To fix it, don't migrate an RT task if it's still running. Signed-off-by: Chanho Min <chanho.min@lge.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAOAMb1BHA=5fm7KTewYyke6u-8DP0iUuJMpgQw54vNeXFsGpoQ@mail.gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-12-06sched/rt: Code cleanup, remove a redundant function callShan Hai
The second call to sched_rt_period() is redundant, because the value of the rt_runtime was already read and it was protected by the ->rt_runtime_lock. Signed-off-by: Shan Hai <haishan.bai@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1322535836-13590-2-git-send-email-haishan.bai@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-12-06sched: Use rt.nr_cpus_allowed to recover select_task_rq() cyclesMike Galbraith
rt.nr_cpus_allowed is always available, use it to bail from select_task_rq() when only one cpu can be used, and saves some cycles for pinned tasks. See the line marked with '*' below: # taskset -c 3 pipe-test PerfTop: 997 irqs/sec kernel:89.5% exact: 0.0% [1000Hz cycles], (all, CPU: 3) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Virgin Patched samples pcnt function samples pcnt function _______ _____ ___________________________ _______ _____ ___________________________ 2880.00 10.2% __schedule 3136.00 11.3% __schedule 1634.00 5.8% pipe_read 1615.00 5.8% pipe_read 1458.00 5.2% system_call 1534.00 5.5% system_call 1382.00 4.9% _raw_spin_lock_irqsave 1412.00 5.1% _raw_spin_lock_irqsave 1202.00 4.3% pipe_write 1255.00 4.5% copy_user_generic_string 1164.00 4.1% copy_user_generic_string 1241.00 4.5% __switch_to 1097.00 3.9% __switch_to 929.00 3.3% mutex_lock 872.00 3.1% mutex_lock 846.00 3.0% mutex_unlock 687.00 2.4% mutex_unlock 804.00 2.9% pipe_write 682.00 2.4% native_sched_clock 713.00 2.6% native_sched_clock 643.00 2.3% system_call_after_swapgs 653.00 2.3% _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore 617.00 2.2% sched_clock_local 633.00 2.3% fsnotify 612.00 2.2% fsnotify 605.00 2.2% sched_clock_local 596.00 2.1% _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore 593.00 2.1% system_call_after_swapgs 542.00 1.9% sysret_check 559.00 2.0% sysret_check 467.00 1.7% fget_light 472.00 1.7% fget_light 462.00 1.6% finish_task_switch 461.00 1.7% finish_task_switch 437.00 1.5% vfs_write 442.00 1.6% vfs_write 431.00 1.5% do_sync_write 428.00 1.5% do_sync_write * 413.00 1.5% select_task_rq_fair 404.00 1.5% _raw_spin_lock_irq 386.00 1.4% update_curr 402.00 1.4% update_curr 385.00 1.4% rw_verify_area 389.00 1.4% do_sync_read 377.00 1.3% _raw_spin_lock_irq 378.00 1.4% vfs_read 369.00 1.3% do_sync_read 340.00 1.2% pipe_iov_copy_from_user 360.00 1.3% vfs_read 316.00 1.1% __wake_up_sync_key 342.00 1.2% hrtick_start_fair 313.00 1.1% __wake_up_common Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1321971504.6855.15.camel@marge.simson.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-11-17sched: Move all scheduler bits into kernel/sched/Peter Zijlstra
There's too many sched*.[ch] files in kernel/, give them their own directory. (No code changed, other than Makefile glue added.) Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>