aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>2012-04-28 23:21:56 +0000
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2012-04-30 13:37:59 -0400
commit518fbf9cdf17875d808596afd77fc115a6f942ca (patch)
tree608d2b518feafdfeade863774e14fc6e37ca31dd /include
parent5414fc12e32a0e0833ec61ba8be864c46cd19966 (diff)
downloadlinaro-lsk-518fbf9cdf17875d808596afd77fc115a6f942ca.tar.gz
net: fix sk_sockets_allocated_read_positive
Denys Fedoryshchenko reported frequent crashes on a proxy server and kindly provided a lockdep report that explains it all : [ 762.903868] [ 762.903880] ================================= [ 762.903890] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ] [ 762.903903] 3.3.4-build-0061 #8 Not tainted [ 762.904133] --------------------------------- [ 762.904344] inconsistent {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} -> {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} usage. [ 762.904542] squid/1603 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes: [ 762.904542] (key#3){+.?...}, at: [<c0232cc4>] __percpu_counter_sum+0xd/0x58 [ 762.904542] {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} state was registered at: [ 762.904542] [<c0158b84>] __lock_acquire+0x284/0xc26 [ 762.904542] [<c01598e8>] lock_acquire+0x71/0x85 [ 762.904542] [<c0349765>] _raw_spin_lock+0x33/0x40 [ 762.904542] [<c0232c93>] __percpu_counter_add+0x58/0x7c [ 762.904542] [<c02cfde1>] sk_clone_lock+0x1e5/0x200 [ 762.904542] [<c0303ee4>] inet_csk_clone_lock+0xe/0x78 [ 762.904542] [<c0315778>] tcp_create_openreq_child+0x1b/0x404 [ 762.904542] [<c031339c>] tcp_v4_syn_recv_sock+0x32/0x1c1 [ 762.904542] [<c031615a>] tcp_check_req+0x1fd/0x2d7 [ 762.904542] [<c0313f77>] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0xab/0x194 [ 762.904542] [<c03153bb>] tcp_v4_rcv+0x3b3/0x5cc [ 762.904542] [<c02fc0c4>] ip_local_deliver_finish+0x13a/0x1e9 [ 762.904542] [<c02fc539>] NF_HOOK.clone.11+0x46/0x4d [ 762.904542] [<c02fc652>] ip_local_deliver+0x41/0x45 [ 762.904542] [<c02fc4d1>] ip_rcv_finish+0x31a/0x33c [ 762.904542] [<c02fc539>] NF_HOOK.clone.11+0x46/0x4d [ 762.904542] [<c02fc857>] ip_rcv+0x201/0x23e [ 762.904542] [<c02daa3a>] __netif_receive_skb+0x319/0x368 [ 762.904542] [<c02dac07>] netif_receive_skb+0x4e/0x7d [ 762.904542] [<c02dacf6>] napi_skb_finish+0x1e/0x34 [ 762.904542] [<c02db122>] napi_gro_receive+0x20/0x24 [ 762.904542] [<f85d1743>] e1000_receive_skb+0x3f/0x45 [e1000e] [ 762.904542] [<f85d3464>] e1000_clean_rx_irq+0x1f9/0x284 [e1000e] [ 762.904542] [<f85d3926>] e1000_clean+0x62/0x1f4 [e1000e] [ 762.904542] [<c02db228>] net_rx_action+0x90/0x160 [ 762.904542] [<c012a445>] __do_softirq+0x7b/0x118 [ 762.904542] irq event stamp: 156915469 [ 762.904542] hardirqs last enabled at (156915469): [<c019b4f4>] __slab_alloc.clone.58.clone.63+0xc4/0x2de [ 762.904542] hardirqs last disabled at (156915468): [<c019b452>] __slab_alloc.clone.58.clone.63+0x22/0x2de [ 762.904542] softirqs last enabled at (156915466): [<c02ce677>] lock_sock_nested+0x64/0x6c [ 762.904542] softirqs last disabled at (156915464): [<c0349914>] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0xe/0x45 [ 762.904542] [ 762.904542] other info that might help us debug this: [ 762.904542] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 762.904542] [ 762.904542] CPU0 [ 762.904542] ---- [ 762.904542] lock(key#3); [ 762.904542] <Interrupt> [ 762.904542] lock(key#3); [ 762.904542] [ 762.904542] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 762.904542] [ 762.904542] 1 lock held by squid/1603: [ 762.904542] #0: (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.+.}, at: [<c03055c0>] lock_sock+0xa/0xc [ 762.904542] [ 762.904542] stack backtrace: [ 762.904542] Pid: 1603, comm: squid Not tainted 3.3.4-build-0061 #8 [ 762.904542] Call Trace: [ 762.904542] [<c0347b73>] ? printk+0x18/0x1d [ 762.904542] [<c015873a>] valid_state+0x1f6/0x201 [ 762.904542] [<c0158816>] mark_lock+0xd1/0x1bb [ 762.904542] [<c015876b>] ? mark_lock+0x26/0x1bb [ 762.904542] [<c015805d>] ? check_usage_forwards+0x77/0x77 [ 762.904542] [<c0158bf8>] __lock_acquire+0x2f8/0xc26 [ 762.904542] [<c0159b8e>] ? mark_held_locks+0x5d/0x7b [ 762.904542] [<c0159cf6>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0xd [ 762.904542] [<c0158dd4>] ? __lock_acquire+0x4d4/0xc26 [ 762.904542] [<c01598e8>] lock_acquire+0x71/0x85 [ 762.904542] [<c0232cc4>] ? __percpu_counter_sum+0xd/0x58 [ 762.904542] [<c0349765>] _raw_spin_lock+0x33/0x40 [ 762.904542] [<c0232cc4>] ? __percpu_counter_sum+0xd/0x58 [ 762.904542] [<c0232cc4>] __percpu_counter_sum+0xd/0x58 [ 762.904542] [<c02cebc4>] __sk_mem_schedule+0xdd/0x1c7 [ 762.904542] [<c02d178d>] ? __alloc_skb+0x76/0x100 [ 762.904542] [<c0305e8e>] sk_wmem_schedule+0x21/0x2d [ 762.904542] [<c0306370>] sk_stream_alloc_skb+0x42/0xaa [ 762.904542] [<c0306567>] tcp_sendmsg+0x18f/0x68b [ 762.904542] [<c031f3dc>] ? ip_fast_csum+0x30/0x30 [ 762.904542] [<c0320193>] inet_sendmsg+0x53/0x5a [ 762.904542] [<c02cb633>] sock_aio_write+0xd2/0xda [ 762.904542] [<c015876b>] ? mark_lock+0x26/0x1bb [ 762.904542] [<c01a1017>] do_sync_write+0x9f/0xd9 [ 762.904542] [<c01a2111>] ? file_free_rcu+0x2f/0x2f [ 762.904542] [<c01a17a1>] vfs_write+0x8f/0xab [ 762.904542] [<c01a284d>] ? fget_light+0x75/0x7c [ 762.904542] [<c01a1900>] sys_write+0x3d/0x5e [ 762.904542] [<c0349ec9>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb [ 762.904542] [<c0340000>] ? rp_sidt+0x41/0x83 Bug is that sk_sockets_allocated_read_positive() calls percpu_counter_sum_positive() without BH being disabled. This bug was added in commit 180d8cd942ce33 (foundations of per-cgroup memory pressure controlling.), since previous code was using percpu_counter_read_positive() which is IRQ safe. In __sk_mem_schedule() we dont need the precise count of allocated sockets and can revert to previous behavior. Reported-by: Denys Fedoryshchenko <denys@visp.net.lb> Sined-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com> Acked-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'include')
-rw-r--r--include/net/sock.h4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index 188532ee88b..5a0a58ac412 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -1129,9 +1129,9 @@ sk_sockets_allocated_read_positive(struct sock *sk)
struct proto *prot = sk->sk_prot;
if (mem_cgroup_sockets_enabled && sk->sk_cgrp)
- return percpu_counter_sum_positive(sk->sk_cgrp->sockets_allocated);
+ return percpu_counter_read_positive(sk->sk_cgrp->sockets_allocated);
- return percpu_counter_sum_positive(prot->sockets_allocated);
+ return percpu_counter_read_positive(prot->sockets_allocated);
}
static inline int