diff options
| author | Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> | 2012-10-31 15:54:37 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com> | 2012-11-20 12:35:16 +0100 |
| commit | 78a3c5ab1749cb78eb06b581c3c13d8e027bef40 (patch) | |
| tree | 7b7f49e283b16bdb2ce65496bae88a30a200eb4d /drivers/mfd/twl-core.c | |
| parent | f4a75d2eb7b1e2206094b901be09adb31ba63681 (diff) | |
mfd: twl-core: Fix chip ID for the twl6030-pwm module
The correct chip id is 1 since the PWM module is on address 0x49. With the
current TWL6030_MODULE_ID1 the kernel will crash early since we have:
#define TWL6030_MODULE_ID1 0x0E
and
static struct twl_client twl_modules[4];
Down in the stack we try to get the module by:
struct twl_client *twl = &twl_modules[chip];
Which is obviously going to do nasty things.
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Acked-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/mfd/twl-core.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/mfd/twl-core.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c b/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c index 4ae64232020..a071a8643a4 100644 --- a/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c +++ b/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c @@ -671,7 +671,7 @@ add_children(struct twl4030_platform_data *pdata, unsigned irq_base, } if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PWM_TWL6030) && twl_class_is_6030()) { - child = add_child(TWL6030_MODULE_ID1, "twl6030-pwm", NULL, 0, + child = add_child(SUB_CHIP_ID1, "twl6030-pwm", NULL, 0, false, 0, 0); if (IS_ERR(child)) return PTR_ERR(child); |