ARM: bL_switcher: Add synchronous enable/disable interface

Some subsystems will need to know for sure whether the switcher is
enabled or disabled during certain critical regions.

This patch provides a simple mutex-based mechanism to discover
whether the switcher is enabled and temporarily lock out further
enable/disable:

  * bL_switcher_get_enabled() returns true iff the switcher is
    enabled and temporarily inhibits enable/disable.

  * bL_switcher_put_enabled() permits enable/disable of the switcher
    again after a previous call to bL_switcher_get_enabled().

Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <dave.martin@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>

1 files changed, 25 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/arch/arm/common/bL_switcher.c b/arch/arm/common/bL_switcher.c
index d18bfdb5dd0..bda51ca23eb 100644
--- a/arch/arm/common/bL_switcher.c
+++ b/arch/arm/common/bL_switcher.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
 #include <linux/hrtimer.h>
 #include <linux/tick.h>
 #include <linux/mm.h>
+#include <linux/mutex.h>
 #include <linux/string.h>
 #include <linux/sysfs.h>
 #include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h>
@@ -345,6 +346,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bL_switch_request);
  * Activation and configuration code.
  */
 
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(bL_switcher_activation_lock);
 static unsigned int bL_switcher_active;
 static unsigned int bL_switcher_cpu_original_cluster[NR_CPUS];
 static cpumask_t bL_switcher_removed_logical_cpus;
@@ -456,9 +458,11 @@ static int bL_switcher_enable(void)
 {
 	int cpu, ret;
 
+	mutex_lock(&bL_switcher_activation_lock);
 	cpu_hotplug_driver_lock();
 	if (bL_switcher_active) {
 		cpu_hotplug_driver_unlock();
+		mutex_unlock(&bL_switcher_activation_lock);
 		return 0;
 	}
 
@@ -467,6 +471,7 @@ static int bL_switcher_enable(void)
 	ret = bL_switcher_halve_cpus();
 	if (ret) {
 		cpu_hotplug_driver_unlock();
+		mutex_unlock(&bL_switcher_activation_lock);
 		return ret;
 	}
 
@@ -479,9 +484,10 @@ static int bL_switcher_enable(void)
 	}
 
 	bL_switcher_active = 1;
-	cpu_hotplug_driver_unlock();
-
 	pr_info("big.LITTLE switcher initialized\n");
+
+	cpu_hotplug_driver_unlock();
+	mutex_unlock(&bL_switcher_activation_lock);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -493,9 +499,11 @@ static void bL_switcher_disable(void)
 	struct bL_thread *t;
 	struct task_struct *task;
 
+	mutex_lock(&bL_switcher_activation_lock);
 	cpu_hotplug_driver_lock();
 	if (!bL_switcher_active) {
 		cpu_hotplug_driver_unlock();
+		mutex_unlock(&bL_switcher_activation_lock);
 		return;
 	}
 	bL_switcher_active = 0;
@@ -540,6 +548,7 @@ static void bL_switcher_disable(void)
 
 	bL_switcher_restore_cpus();
 	cpu_hotplug_driver_unlock();
+	mutex_unlock(&bL_switcher_activation_lock);
 }
 
 static ssize_t bL_switcher_active_show(struct kobject *kobj,
@@ -597,6 +606,20 @@ static int __init bL_switcher_sysfs_init(void)
 
 #endif  /* CONFIG_SYSFS */
 
+bool bL_switcher_get_enabled(void)
+{
+	mutex_lock(&bL_switcher_activation_lock);
+
+	return bL_switcher_active;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bL_switcher_get_enabled);
+
+void bL_switcher_put_enabled(void)
+{
+	mutex_unlock(&bL_switcher_activation_lock);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bL_switcher_put_enabled);
+
 /*
  * Veto any CPU hotplug operation while the switcher is active.
  * We're just not ready to deal with that given the trickery involved.