|author||Jeremy Fitzhardinge <email@example.com>||2011-09-08 17:50:12 -0700|
|committer||Jeremy Fitzhardinge <firstname.lastname@example.org>||2011-09-27 23:37:20 -0700|
x86, ticketlock: remove obsolete comment
The note about partial registers is not really relevent now that we rely on gcc to generate all the assembler. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <email@example.com>
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h
index f5695eeb83f..972c260919a 100644
@@ -49,10 +49,6 @@
* issues and should be optimal for the uncontended case. Note the tail must be
* in the high part, because a wide xadd increment of the low part would carry
* up and contaminate the high part.
- * With fewer than 2^8 possible CPUs, we can use x86's partial registers to
- * save some instructions and make the code more elegant. There really isn't
- * much between them in performance though, especially as locks are out of line.
static __always_inline void __ticket_spin_lock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)