From 44234adcdce38f83c56e05f808ce656175b4beeb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Frederic Weisbecker Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 09:25:48 +0100 Subject: hw-breakpoints: Modify breakpoints without unregistering them Currently, when ptrace needs to modify a breakpoint, like disabling it, changing its address, type or len, it calls modify_user_hw_breakpoint(). This latter will perform the heavy and racy task of unregistering the old breakpoint and registering a new one. This is racy as someone else might steal the reserved breakpoint slot under us, which is undesired as the breakpoint is only supposed to be modified, sometimes in the middle of a debugging workflow. We don't want our slot to be stolen in the middle. So instead of unregistering/registering the breakpoint, just disable it while we modify its breakpoint fields and re-enable it after if necessary. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Prasad LKML-Reference: <1260347148-5519-1-git-send-regression-fweisbec@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/x86') diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c index b361d28061d..7079ddaf073 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c @@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ static unsigned long ptrace_get_dr7(struct perf_event *bp[]) return dr7; } -static struct perf_event * +static int ptrace_modify_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp, int len, int type, struct task_struct *tsk, int disabled) { @@ -609,11 +609,11 @@ ptrace_modify_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp, int len, int type, * written the address register first */ if (!bp) - return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); + return -EINVAL; err = arch_bp_generic_fields(len, type, &gen_len, &gen_type); if (err) - return ERR_PTR(err); + return err; attr = bp->attr; attr.bp_len = gen_len; @@ -658,28 +658,17 @@ restore: if (!second_pass) continue; - thread->ptrace_bps[i] = NULL; - bp = ptrace_modify_breakpoint(bp, len, type, + rc = ptrace_modify_breakpoint(bp, len, type, tsk, 1); - if (IS_ERR(bp)) { - rc = PTR_ERR(bp); - thread->ptrace_bps[i] = NULL; + if (rc) break; - } - thread->ptrace_bps[i] = bp; } continue; } - bp = ptrace_modify_breakpoint(bp, len, type, tsk, 0); - - /* Incorrect bp, or we have a bug in bp API */ - if (IS_ERR(bp)) { - rc = PTR_ERR(bp); - thread->ptrace_bps[i] = NULL; + rc = ptrace_modify_breakpoint(bp, len, type, tsk, 0); + if (rc) break; - } - thread->ptrace_bps[i] = bp; } /* * Make a second pass to free the remaining unused breakpoints @@ -737,26 +726,32 @@ static int ptrace_set_breakpoint_addr(struct task_struct *tsk, int nr, attr.disabled = 1; bp = register_user_hw_breakpoint(&attr, ptrace_triggered, tsk); + + /* + * CHECKME: the previous code returned -EIO if the addr wasn't + * a valid task virtual addr. The new one will return -EINVAL in + * this case. + * -EINVAL may be what we want for in-kernel breakpoints users, + * but -EIO looks better for ptrace, since we refuse a register + * writing for the user. And anyway this is the previous + * behaviour. + */ + if (IS_ERR(bp)) + return PTR_ERR(bp); + + t->ptrace_bps[nr] = bp; } else { + int err; + bp = t->ptrace_bps[nr]; - t->ptrace_bps[nr] = NULL; attr = bp->attr; attr.bp_addr = addr; - bp = modify_user_hw_breakpoint(bp, &attr); + err = modify_user_hw_breakpoint(bp, &attr); + if (err) + return err; } - /* - * CHECKME: the previous code returned -EIO if the addr wasn't a - * valid task virtual addr. The new one will return -EINVAL in this - * case. - * -EINVAL may be what we want for in-kernel breakpoints users, but - * -EIO looks better for ptrace, since we refuse a register writing - * for the user. And anyway this is the previous behaviour. - */ - if (IS_ERR(bp)) - return PTR_ERR(bp); - t->ptrace_bps[nr] = bp; return 0; } -- cgit v1.2.3