From ecec5ba681a0bf1165899f8b1889f06fcd8e901a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Al Viro Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 20:36:00 +0100 Subject: fix uml-x86_64 __NR_syscall_max is done in x86_64 asm-offsets; do an equivalent in uml kern_constants.h Signed-off-by: Al Viro Acked-by: Jeff Dike Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- arch/um/sys-x86_64/syscall_table.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/um/sys-x86_64') diff --git a/arch/um/sys-x86_64/syscall_table.c b/arch/um/sys-x86_64/syscall_table.c index 9e9ad72c2ba..5133988d361 100644 --- a/arch/um/sys-x86_64/syscall_table.c +++ b/arch/um/sys-x86_64/syscall_table.c @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #define __NO_STUBS @@ -45,8 +46,8 @@ typedef void (*sys_call_ptr_t)(void); extern void sys_ni_syscall(void); -sys_call_ptr_t sys_call_table[__NR_syscall_max+1] __cacheline_aligned = { +sys_call_ptr_t sys_call_table[UM_NR_syscall_max+1] __cacheline_aligned = { /* Smells like a like a compiler bug -- it doesn't work when the & below is removed. */ - [0 ... __NR_syscall_max] = &sys_ni_syscall, + [0 ... UM_NR_syscall_max] = &sys_ni_syscall, #include }; -- cgit v1.2.3