From 4e4e520fd52cfdcc7232c4762a78016e7656cad2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Russell King Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 22:42:20 +0000 Subject: [ARM] Fix Versatile PB initialisation to use .init_machine There's no point having the Versatile PB initialisation using an arch_initcall() and then checking whether it's running on a Versatile PB board - this is what the .init_machine function pointer in the machine description is for. Use it. Signed-off-by: Russell King --- arch/arm/mach-versatile/versatile_pb.c | 18 +++++++----------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/arm/mach-versatile') diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-versatile/versatile_pb.c b/arch/arm/mach-versatile/versatile_pb.c index 503725b166f..be439bb9d45 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-versatile/versatile_pb.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-versatile/versatile_pb.c @@ -81,22 +81,18 @@ static struct amba_device *amba_devs[] __initdata = { &mmc1_device, }; -static int __init versatile_pb_init(void) +static void __init versatile_pb_init(void) { int i; - if (machine_is_versatile_pb()) { - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(amba_devs); i++) { - struct amba_device *d = amba_devs[i]; - amba_device_register(d, &iomem_resource); - } - } + versatile_init(); - return 0; + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(amba_devs); i++) { + struct amba_device *d = amba_devs[i]; + amba_device_register(d, &iomem_resource); + } } -arch_initcall(versatile_pb_init); - MACHINE_START(VERSATILE_PB, "ARM-Versatile PB") /* Maintainer: ARM Ltd/Deep Blue Solutions Ltd */ .phys_io = 0x101f1000, @@ -105,5 +101,5 @@ MACHINE_START(VERSATILE_PB, "ARM-Versatile PB") .map_io = versatile_map_io, .init_irq = versatile_init_irq, .timer = &versatile_timer, - .init_machine = versatile_init, + .init_machine = versatile_pb_init, MACHINE_END -- cgit v1.2.3