diff options
| author | Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com> | 2006-01-09 15:59:24 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@hera.kernel.org> | 2006-01-09 15:59:24 -0800 |
| commit | 1b1dcc1b57a49136f118a0f16367256ff9994a69 (patch) | |
| tree | b0b36d4f41d28c9d6514fb309d33c1a084d6309b /fs/devfs | |
| parent | 794ee1baee1c26be40410233e6c20bceb2b03c08 (diff) | |
[PATCH] mutex subsystem, semaphore to mutex: VFS, ->i_sem
This patch converts the inode semaphore to a mutex. I have tested it on
XFS and compiled as much as one can consider on an ia64. Anyway your
luck with it might be different.
Modified-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
(finished the conversion)
Signed-off-by: Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/devfs')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/devfs/base.c | 22 |
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/fs/devfs/base.c b/fs/devfs/base.c index 1274422a538..b621521e09d 100644 --- a/fs/devfs/base.c +++ b/fs/devfs/base.c @@ -2162,27 +2162,27 @@ static int devfs_d_revalidate_wait(struct dentry *dentry, struct nameidata *nd) * * make sure that * d_instantiate always runs under lock - * we release i_sem lock before going to sleep + * we release i_mutex lock before going to sleep * * unfortunately sometimes d_revalidate is called with - * and sometimes without i_sem lock held. The following checks + * and sometimes without i_mutex lock held. The following checks * attempt to deduce when we need to add (and drop resp.) lock * here. This relies on current (2.6.2) calling coventions: * - * lookup_hash is always run under i_sem and is passing NULL + * lookup_hash is always run under i_mutex and is passing NULL * as nd * - * open(...,O_CREATE,...) calls _lookup_hash under i_sem + * open(...,O_CREATE,...) calls _lookup_hash under i_mutex * and sets flags to LOOKUP_OPEN|LOOKUP_CREATE * * all other invocations of ->d_revalidate seem to happen - * outside of i_sem + * outside of i_mutex */ need_lock = nd && (!(nd->flags & LOOKUP_CREATE) || (nd->flags & LOOKUP_PARENT)); if (need_lock) - down(&dir->i_sem); + mutex_lock(&dir->i_mutex); if (is_devfsd_or_child(fs_info)) { devfs_handle_t de = lookup_info->de; @@ -2221,9 +2221,9 @@ static int devfs_d_revalidate_wait(struct dentry *dentry, struct nameidata *nd) add_wait_queue(&lookup_info->wait_queue, &wait); read_unlock(&parent->u.dir.lock); /* at this point it is always (hopefully) locked */ - up(&dir->i_sem); + mutex_unlock(&dir->i_mutex); schedule(); - down(&dir->i_sem); + mutex_lock(&dir->i_mutex); /* * This does not need nor should remove wait from wait_queue. * Wait queue head is never reused - nothing is ever added to it @@ -2238,7 +2238,7 @@ static int devfs_d_revalidate_wait(struct dentry *dentry, struct nameidata *nd) out: if (need_lock) - up(&dir->i_sem); + mutex_unlock(&dir->i_mutex); return 1; } /* End Function devfs_d_revalidate_wait */ @@ -2284,9 +2284,9 @@ static struct dentry *devfs_lookup(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, /* Unlock directory semaphore, which will release any waiters. They will get the hashed dentry, and may be forced to wait for revalidation */ - up(&dir->i_sem); + mutex_unlock(&dir->i_mutex); wait_for_devfsd_finished(fs_info); /* If I'm not devfsd, must wait */ - down(&dir->i_sem); /* Grab it again because them's the rules */ + mutex_lock(&dir->i_mutex); /* Grab it again because them's the rules */ de = lookup_info.de; /* If someone else has been so kind as to make the inode, we go home early */ |