From 86e4e20e8a5301ff7104a4f40f35fd5bee408186 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 23:40:00 +0100 Subject: ACPI: Always check if _PRW is present before trying to evaluate it Before evaluating _PRW for devices that are reported as inactive or not present by their _STA control methods we should check if those methods are actually present (otherwise the evaulation of _PRW will obviously fail and a scary message will be printed unnecessarily). Reported-by: Andreas Mohr Reported-by: Maciej Rutecki Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Len Brown --- drivers/acpi/scan.c | 9 +++++++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/acpi/scan.c') diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c index 64d4da0d6d5..b5e4dedb497 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c @@ -1388,7 +1388,6 @@ static acpi_status acpi_bus_check_add(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, struct acpi_bus_ops *ops = context; int type; unsigned long long sta; - struct acpi_device_wakeup wakeup; struct acpi_device *device; acpi_status status; int result; @@ -1399,7 +1398,13 @@ static acpi_status acpi_bus_check_add(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, if (!(sta & ACPI_STA_DEVICE_PRESENT) && !(sta & ACPI_STA_DEVICE_FUNCTIONING)) { - acpi_bus_extract_wakeup_device_power_package(handle, &wakeup); + struct acpi_device_wakeup wakeup; + acpi_handle temp; + + status = acpi_get_handle(handle, "_PRW", &temp); + if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) + acpi_bus_extract_wakeup_device_power_package(handle, + &wakeup); return AE_CTRL_DEPTH; } -- cgit v1.2.3