aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>2014-06-07 12:10:36 +0200
committerAnders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>2015-03-23 09:31:10 +0100
commit0654c47f42cdfc4578683be076ccab2ae3604487 (patch)
tree00fbd351ed639b70f43ef83cd74f5e9fa4ab3649
parentc7534ea5cb93f560bbcf28150c0ac736ace84c0e (diff)
rtmutex: No need to keep task ref for lock owner check
upstream commit: 2ffa5a5cd2fe792b6399c903d5172adf088d8ff7 There is no point to keep the task ref across the check for lock owner. Drop the ref before that, so the protection context is clear. Found while documenting the chain walk. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
-rw-r--r--kernel/locking/rtmutex.c5
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
index e4cbd0cd5405..901a29345451 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -484,6 +484,8 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
/* Release the task */
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
+ put_task_struct(task);
+
if (!rt_mutex_owner(lock)) {
struct rt_mutex_waiter *lock_top_waiter;
@@ -495,9 +497,8 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
if (top_waiter != lock_top_waiter)
rt_mutex_wake_waiter(lock_top_waiter);
raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
- goto out_put_task;
+ return 0;
}
- put_task_struct(task);
/* Grab the next task */
task = rt_mutex_owner(lock);